Paralegals: Don't Discount the 'Value' of Securing Medical Bills
Medical bills or itemized statements are associated with care rendered to an individual by a physician, hospital or group practice for a specific illness or condition. These amounts relate to hospital admissions, office visits, therapy or surgeries.
July 20, 2017 at 05:21 PM
17 minute read
Medical bills or itemized statements are associated with care rendered to an individual by a physician, hospital or group practice for a specific illness or condition. These amounts relate to hospital admissions, office visits, therapy or surgeries. Additional costs may be incurred for rehabilitation, injections, prescription medication or orthopedic appliances. In personal injury or workers' compensation matters, medical expenses are tied to an actual event, e.g., motor vehicle accident, slip and fall or injury in the course of employment. In addition to proving damages, medical bills contain an abundance of other valuable information that may be particularly helpful to the legal team in the litigation of a case.
The task of requesting, organizing and summarizing medical records is regularly handled by a paralegal. However, a paralegal should also be cognizant of the importance of issuing separate requests (perhaps even to other entities) for the release of invoices. Medical billing is often handled by an outside company (sometimes even by an out-of-state agency) on behalf of a health care provider. Inquiries should include the full name of the patient, date of birth, dates of service, as well as account numbers or medical record numbers. Note that if a client was treated in an emergency room or admitted to a hospital, there could be multiple physicians from whom you will need to obtain records. These encompass independent charges for services such as consultations, review of diagnostic studies, etc.
Medical bills are acquired in a variety of ways including: receipt from clients; issuance of valid subpoenas; executed authorizations; and court order. Due to the overwhelming number of requests, many health care providers secure the services of an independent organization to process inquiries. Businesses such as Chart Swap or MRO allow third-party requestors to establish portal accounts to simplify submissions and responses. The use of an outside company results in time and expense savings for both the provider as well as the entity while maintaining confidentiality. It is essential to follow guidelines and procedures of a provider when directing inquiries for release of medical expenses. Be sure to adhere to any unique requirements, e.g., special authorizations or pre-payments. Although time consuming, it may be beneficial to retain a paper-based folder or electronic spreadsheet of practices, noting details such as contact information and prerequisites. This added step will certainly facilitate the administration of requests and subsequent inquiries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute read'Only When They Have No Choice': Has Big Law's Remote Hiring Wave Run its Course?
'We Have That Equal Responsibility': One Am Law 50 Firm's Approach to Lateral Integration
6 minute readWith Chair Regularly on the Road, Duane Morris Names First Phila. Office Managing Partner
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Rethink Everything' or 'Optimize What's Working'? The Right Law Firm Strategy
- 2Working Across the 'Entire Ecosystem' Propels Ropes & Gray's Life Sciences Practice
- 3Government Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
- 4Court of Chancery Vice Chancellor Glasscock Reflects on Rewards of Equity Work, Clerks and the Delaware Way
- 5Breon Peace, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Announces Upcoming Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250