Paralegals: Don't Discount the 'Value' of Securing Medical Bills
Medical bills or itemized statements are associated with care rendered to an individual by a physician, hospital or group practice for a specific illness or condition. These amounts relate to hospital admissions, office visits, therapy or surgeries.
July 20, 2017 at 05:21 PM
17 minute read
Medical bills or itemized statements are associated with care rendered to an individual by a physician, hospital or group practice for a specific illness or condition. These amounts relate to hospital admissions, office visits, therapy or surgeries. Additional costs may be incurred for rehabilitation, injections, prescription medication or orthopedic appliances. In personal injury or workers' compensation matters, medical expenses are tied to an actual event, e.g., motor vehicle accident, slip and fall or injury in the course of employment. In addition to proving damages, medical bills contain an abundance of other valuable information that may be particularly helpful to the legal team in the litigation of a case.
The task of requesting, organizing and summarizing medical records is regularly handled by a paralegal. However, a paralegal should also be cognizant of the importance of issuing separate requests (perhaps even to other entities) for the release of invoices. Medical billing is often handled by an outside company (sometimes even by an out-of-state agency) on behalf of a health care provider. Inquiries should include the full name of the patient, date of birth, dates of service, as well as account numbers or medical record numbers. Note that if a client was treated in an emergency room or admitted to a hospital, there could be multiple physicians from whom you will need to obtain records. These encompass independent charges for services such as consultations, review of diagnostic studies, etc.
Medical bills are acquired in a variety of ways including: receipt from clients; issuance of valid subpoenas; executed authorizations; and court order. Due to the overwhelming number of requests, many health care providers secure the services of an independent organization to process inquiries. Businesses such as Chart Swap or MRO allow third-party requestors to establish portal accounts to simplify submissions and responses. The use of an outside company results in time and expense savings for both the provider as well as the entity while maintaining confidentiality. It is essential to follow guidelines and procedures of a provider when directing inquiries for release of medical expenses. Be sure to adhere to any unique requirements, e.g., special authorizations or pre-payments. Although time consuming, it may be beneficial to retain a paper-based folder or electronic spreadsheet of practices, noting details such as contact information and prerequisites. This added step will certainly facilitate the administration of requests and subsequent inquiries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
- 2Divided Eighth Circuit Sides With GE's Timely Removal of Indemnification Action to Federal Court
- 3Former U.S. Dept. of Education Attorney Suspended for Failure to Complete CLE Credits
- 4ArentFox Schiff Adds Global Complex Litigation Partner in Los Angeles
- 5Bittensor Hackers, Accused of Stealing Over $28 Million, Face Federal Lawsuit
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250