Intentional Torts • Defamation • Per Se Claim • Evidence of Damages
Chasan v. Littman et al, PICS Case No. 17-1065 (C.P. Philadelphia June 30, 2017) Robinson, J. (11 pages).
Plaintiff’s allegations were sufficient to establish that the defendant attorney’s publications accusing him of criminal conduct constituted per se defamation, but he was not absolved of his burden of proving damages. The trial court recommended affirmance of its decision granting defendant summary judgment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
