The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that a warrantless blood draw from an unconscious DUI suspect is improper—but the justices had more difficulty reaching a consensus on exactly why that is.

Four justices in Commonwealth v. Myers—Justice David N. Wecht, who penned the lead opinion, and Justices Kevin M. Dougherty, Christine L. Donohue and Debra Todd—agreed that the implied consent statute, 75 Pa.C.S. Section 1547, does not permit a warrantless blood draw from an unconscious DUI suspect because such a suspect cannot exercise his or her right to refuse the test, which is an essential element of the statute.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]