Assessing Current and Future Trump Nominees to the Third Circuit
The Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is authorized to have 14 judges in active service. The court, however, currently has three vacancies. Two of those vacancies, one in Pennsylvania and one in New Jersey, existed before last November's presidential election and continue to exist now. The third vacancy occurred when Circuit Judge D. Michael Fisher took senior status in February of this year.
August 14, 2017 at 05:27 PM
11 minute read
Upon Further Review
The Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is authorized to have 14 judges in active service. The court, however, currently has three vacancies. Two of those vacancies, one in Pennsylvania and one in New Jersey, existed before last November's presidential election and continue to exist now. The third vacancy occurred when Circuit Judge D. Michael Fisher took senior status in February of this year.
In June of this year, President Donald Trump nominated professor Stephanos Bibas of the University of Pennsylvania Law School to fill the earlier of the two Pennsylvania vacancies on the Third Circuit. According to a recent article by Politico reporter Seung Min Kim, the American Bar Association has given Bibas the judicial evaluation of well-qualified, the ABA's highest rating for judicial nominees.
Filling judicial vacancies, in contrast to numerous other things, is an area in which Trump has received credit for advancing his agenda early in his time in office. In addition to confirming Neil M. Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, the U.S. Senate has also confirmed three federal appellate judges thus far, two to the Sixth Circuit (both from Kentucky) and one to the Eleventh Circuit (from Alabama). In Alabama and Kentucky, however, both U.S. senators are Republican.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/23/32/48b6e7ed401f93d28fc3749c6e06/dominos-pizza-restaurant-06-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
4 minute read![US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/03/Linz-Miller-767x633.jpg)
US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes
4 minute read![Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2023/05/Johnsons-Talc-Powder-6-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute read![Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/07/Pennsylvania-Supreme-Court-justices_2-767x633.jpg)
Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250