In Re: Blood Reagents Antitrust Litig., PICS Case No. 17-1246 (E.D.Pa. July 19, 2017) DuBois, J. (64 pages).
Defendant's summary judgment motion on Sherman Act violation denied to the extent plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence that defendant's shift in price increase strategy represented "abrupt" change for industry and was paralleled by sole competitor. Summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
August 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM
7 minute read
Conspiracy to Restrain Trade • Price-fixing • Evidence of Collusion
In Re: Blood Reagents Antitrust Litig., PICS Case No. 17-1246 (E.D.Pa. July 19, 2017) DuBois, J. (64 pages).
Defendant's summary judgment motion on Sherman Act violation denied to the extent plaintiffs presented sufficient evidence that defendant's shift in price increase strategy represented “abrupt” change for industry and was paralleled by sole competitor. Summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 3First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
- 4The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 5The Growing Tension—And Opportunity—in Big Law Nonequity Tiers
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250