The Nuts and Bolts of Retirement Distributions—Part 1
This article and another to follow later in the year review some of the basic rules of retirement distributions. Start with Social Security benefits. As discussed previously, there are options as to when you begin receiving Social Security benefits, basically from age 62 to age 70.
August 28, 2017 at 05:12 PM
8 minute read
Editor's note: This is the first in a two-part series.
This article and another to follow later in the year review some of the basic rules of retirement distributions. Start with Social Security benefits. As discussed previously, there are options as to when you begin receiving Social Security benefits, basically from age 62 to age 70. While waiting until age 70 results in a significant increase in benefit amounts, there's no point in waiting beyond age 70. (And it is not correct to say that it's always better to wait until age 70. It depends on your particular circumstance, including your health and your family history.) Whatever choice you make, payments will be subject to federal income tax for most people: up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits can be subject to federal income taxes depending on the taxpayer's income level. One of the choices you will make when you begin receiving benefits is whether you want federal income tax withheld from your payments. If you are enrolled in the Medicare program, the required payments for that program will be deducted from your Social Security benefits. (Medicare costs are adjusted upward for higher income enrollees, but if your income subsequently falls in retirement, you can seek an adjustment in these required payments.) Once you have decided when you want to begin receiving Social Security benefits, the other decisions are not complicated. Most people receive their benefit payments through direct deposit into a bank account. As I have also discussed previously, Social Security has an informative and user-friendly website, and my experiences with agents of the Social Security Administration have been positive.
Medicare is a program with more choices, some of them complex, and while Medicare also has an excellent website, the wide range of choices available for health care in retirement means that either more study of those choices is required or outside assistance should be obtained. This is an aspect of retirement distributions, because planning on how to optimize those distributions includes consideration of what expenses will be incurred in retirement. The choices made regarding Medicare, and supplemental health insurance, can have varying effects on the need for retirement distributions. Put another way, planning for retirement distributions includes planning for retirement expenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
- 2New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
- 3Family of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
- 4Houston Appeals Court Split Over Race Discrimination Suit Involving COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution
- 5‘It's Your Funeral’: On Avoiding Damaging Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250