The Nuts and Bolts of Retirement Distributions—Part 1
This article and another to follow later in the year review some of the basic rules of retirement distributions. Start with Social Security benefits. As discussed previously, there are options as to when you begin receiving Social Security benefits, basically from age 62 to age 70.
August 28, 2017 at 05:12 PM
8 minute read
Editor's note: This is the first in a two-part series.
This article and another to follow later in the year review some of the basic rules of retirement distributions. Start with Social Security benefits. As discussed previously, there are options as to when you begin receiving Social Security benefits, basically from age 62 to age 70. While waiting until age 70 results in a significant increase in benefit amounts, there's no point in waiting beyond age 70. (And it is not correct to say that it's always better to wait until age 70. It depends on your particular circumstance, including your health and your family history.) Whatever choice you make, payments will be subject to federal income tax for most people: up to 85 percent of Social Security benefits can be subject to federal income taxes depending on the taxpayer's income level. One of the choices you will make when you begin receiving benefits is whether you want federal income tax withheld from your payments. If you are enrolled in the Medicare program, the required payments for that program will be deducted from your Social Security benefits. (Medicare costs are adjusted upward for higher income enrollees, but if your income subsequently falls in retirement, you can seek an adjustment in these required payments.) Once you have decided when you want to begin receiving Social Security benefits, the other decisions are not complicated. Most people receive their benefit payments through direct deposit into a bank account. As I have also discussed previously, Social Security has an informative and user-friendly website, and my experiences with agents of the Social Security Administration have been positive.
Medicare is a program with more choices, some of them complex, and while Medicare also has an excellent website, the wide range of choices available for health care in retirement means that either more study of those choices is required or outside assistance should be obtained. This is an aspect of retirement distributions, because planning on how to optimize those distributions includes consideration of what expenses will be incurred in retirement. The choices made regarding Medicare, and supplemental health insurance, can have varying effects on the need for retirement distributions. Put another way, planning for retirement distributions includes planning for retirement expenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Trending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250