Low-Income Tenants in Landlord-Tenant Disputes
Last year alone, more than 24,000 eviction cases were filed in Philadelphia. In these cases, 81 percent of landlords had legal representation. Approximately 8 percent of tenants were represented. Philadelphia does have statutory safeguards and processes that govern the eviction process; however, tenants must be aware of their rights and defenses in order to effectively navigate through landlord-tenant court.
August 29, 2017 at 04:45 PM
12 minute read
Last year alone, more than 24,000 eviction cases were filed in Philadelphia. In these cases, 81 percent of landlords had legal representation. Approximately 8 percent of tenants were represented. Philadelphia does have statutory safeguards and processes that govern the eviction process; however, tenants must be aware of their rights and defenses in order to effectively navigate through landlord-tenant court. Because of a renewed interest in tenant rights in the city, this article will focus on the landlord-tenant process and representation of low-income individuals within landlord-tenant court.
The majority of tenants will face a landlord-tenant court action as pro se litigants. For many of these tenants, the failure to appear at the hearing results in default judgments in favor of the landlord. Education and community outreach can greatly reduce the number of default judgments, as simply advising a tenant of their rights can encourage them to participate in the process.
Generally, there are two remedies for a landlord in municipal court. The first is possession of the property, which will be explained further below. In addition to the judgment for eviction, landlords may also be seeking a money judgment against the tenant for rent, attorney fees and court costs. While a low-income individual may be “judgment proof” due to lack of income and assets, the judgment is something that will appear on their credit, may keep them from getting another apartment, or hurt them down the line in other ways because many employers now include a credit report as part of the hiring process. The first step in defense of a money judgment is ensuring that the landlord has the required documentation to rent the property. In Philadelphia, a landlord needs to have several licenses to rent the property: a Certificate of Rental Suitability, a Partner for Good Housing Handbook and, if there are children under 6 in the unit, a lead safe/lead free certificate. These documents are important as they allow a landlord to receive a judgment for any money that is owed under the lease. They also provide a defense for nonpayment of rent. Regardless of the tenant's reason for failure to pay rent, the law states that a landlord should not be awarded money for any period when they were not appropriately licensed. These licenses are not merely a mechanism to enforce appropriate damages. They serve as a safeguard put in place by the city to hold landlords accountable to housing code standards and to educate tenants about their rights. Oftentimes this information is key to a negotiated agreement or more positive outcome.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Financially Grounded: South Florida-Based Silver Airways Files for Bankruptcy
- 2Cozen O'Connor Accused of Overbilling, Duplicate Work
- 3Texas Judge Resigns Amid Ethics Case
- 4Skadden Corporate Partner Departs For Cooley in Beijing
- 5Sidley Cross-Border Transactions Partner Heads to Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250