Two Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices took issue with their colleagues’ decision to allow authorities to hold a jeweler’s entire inventory during the course of a burglary investigation.
Justice David N. Wecht, joined by Justice Christine Donohue in his dissent to a high court order allowing Montgomery County authorities to hold 50,000 pieces of jewelry belonging to Jasmeen Kaur and DUA Diamonds, said the court’s decision means law enforcement can seize property with impunity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
