Sunoco Loses Bid to Arbitrate Proposed Rewards Card Class Action
A split circuit court panel has rejected Sunoco's attempts to compel arbitration in a proposed class action alleging the company's rewards card program cheated customers.
September 05, 2017 at 01:38 PM
3 minute read
A split circuit court panel has rejected Sunoco's attempts to compel arbitration in a proposed class action alleging the company's rewards card program cheated customers.
A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled Tuesday that, since only Citibank, and not Sunoco, was a signatory to the awards program agreement, the Pennsylvania-based gasoline retailer could not compel arbitration. The decision upheld a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Sunoco had argued the awards program contract should be considered as part of an overall joint agreement between plaintiff Donald White, Citibank and Sunoco, based on the gas company's promotional and advertising materials.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute read
Judge Approves $25M Medical Monitoring Settlement Over Philips CPAP Devices
3 minute read
3rd Circuit Revives Class Action Against Bayer Over Benzene-Contaminated Products
4 minute read
'Training to Replace Yourself': Kessler Topaz Co-Founder Set to Retire
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 2Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 3FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
- 4Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
- 5Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Del. Drug Patent Fight
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
