Case Puts Spotlight on Social Media and Attorney Conduct
A day doesn't seem to go by without another report of a lawyer whose conduct on social media has resulted in either sanctions or disciplinary proceedings. Whether it is advising a client to delete content on Facebook, or responding to a negative Yelp review by revealing confidential information, or having a staff member "friend" someone without disclosing their relationship, lawyers continue to get themselves into trouble. And no matter how many times lawyers such as I who write, lecture and warn other lawyers to be careful about their use of social media, they still ignore the advice and end up in hot water.
September 07, 2017 at 04:45 PM
8 minute read
A day doesn't seem to go by without another report of a lawyer whose conduct on social media has resulted in either sanctions or disciplinary proceedings. Whether it is advising a client to delete content on Facebook, or responding to a negative Yelp review by revealing confidential information, or having a staff member “friend” someone without disclosing their relationship, lawyers continue to get themselves into trouble. And no matter how many times lawyers such as I who write, lecture and warn other lawyers to be careful about their use of social media, they still ignore the advice and end up in hot water.
The most recent example is Centre County District Attorney Stacy Parks Miller, who faces a disciplinary hearing for, among other things, creating a fake Facebook page to “snoop” on criminal defendants and others. While all of the details of attorney Parks Miller's case are not public, there is enough information available to demonstrate that she was taking a risk, and that her fate now lies with the Disciplinary Board, and ultimately with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before turning to the Parks Miller case, it helps to provide some historical references. First, the Centre County district attorney is not alone. There are numerous attorneys who have been disciplined for the manner in which they conducted themselves on social media websites. Second, the DA's case raises a question that has not been answered: Is there or should there be a prosecutorial exception to the Rules of Professional Conduct implicated in these cases?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Only When They Have No Choice': Has Big Law's Remote Hiring Wave Run its Course?
'We Have That Equal Responsibility': One Am Law 50 Firm's Approach to Lateral Integration
6 minute readWith Chair Regularly on the Road, Duane Morris Names First Phila. Office Managing Partner
4 minute read'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 2People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 3How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
- 4Avoiding Inadvertent Conflict Issues With Constituents When Representing Organizational Clients
- 5Debtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250