Understanding How 529 Plans Fit Into the Estate Plan
As summer has been winding down, so many of our clients' children and grandchildren have headed off to college in the last few weeks and have begun (or resumed) tackling hefty tuition bills. Many families have set aside funds, in one form or another, in advance for these college costs.
September 07, 2017 at 05:27 PM
8 minute read
As summer has been winding down, so many of our clients' children and grandchildren have headed off to college in the last few weeks and have begun (or resumed) tackling hefty tuition bills. Many families have set aside funds, in one form or another, in advance for these college costs. Setting aside funds for future college costs in advance not only can help provide peace of mind, but also may generate “subsidies” by the available gift, estate, and income tax benefits. One of the ways this can be accomplished is through investments in 529 plans.
|Basics
A qualified tuition program (QTP), more commonly known as a “529 plan,” is an education savings program which allows you to make contributions to an account set up to meet an individual's future higher education expenses or buy tuition credits for an individual. The name “529″ refers to Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code which was enacted by Congress in 1996 to create these types of savings plans which encourage saving for higher education by providing generous tax breaks.
|Types of 529 Plans
There are two basic types of 529 plans: prepaid tuition plans and savings plans. Each state has its own plan, and each state may offer both types of plans. A qualified education institution, however, can only offer a prepaid tuition type 529 plan. Pennsylvania offers two types of plans: the PA 529 Guaranteed Savings Plan (GSP), which allows you to purchase tuition credits based on today's rates, and the PA 529 Investment Plan (IP) which allows you to choose from 15 investment options through Vanguard. An individual's state of residency will not restrict which 529 plan he can invest in, so it is important to research 529 plans offered in various states to determine which plan is the best fit. There are many publicly available websites which offer state by state comparisons, taking into account various factors, such as enrollment fees and expense ratios, investment options, state residency requirements and minimum and maximum contributions. Some states provide incentives for residents who invest in their own state plan. It is advisable to weigh all of the factors in determining which plan to invest in since the market is competitive.
|Income Tax Savings
The earnings on contributions to a qualified tuition program will accumulate tax-free until the college costs are paid from the funds, and distributions are tax-free to the extent the funds are used to pay qualified higher education expenses. While contributions to a 529 plan are not deductible for federal purposes, in Pennsylvania taxpayers may deduct their contributions from Pennsylvania taxable income up to $14,000 per beneficiary per year (married couples can deduct up to $28,000 per beneficiary per year, provided each spouse has taxable income of at least $14,000).
|Gift & GST Tax Benefits
Contributions to 529 plans are eligible for the annual exclusion from the federal gift tax (currently $14,000 per donor or $28,000 for a married couple splitting the gift), and from the federal generation skipping transfer (GST) tax (only relevant if the beneficiary is a grandchild of the donor). Contributions can be front-loaded so that a donor who contributes more than the annual exclusion limit for the year can elect to treat the gifts as if they were spread out over a five-year period. This allows you to use as much as $70,000 (or $140,000 for a married couple splitting the gift) in annual exclusions to cover a larger contribution. It is important to understand that if this election is desired, it must be reported on a timely filed gift tax return, and each subsequent year (for a period of five years), the 1/5 portion must be taken into account when determining what, if any, annual exclusion remains available for each donee. Care should be taken when contributing to 529 accounts for those individuals who are already making other gifts to the beneficiary, to make sure that the annual exclusion limit is not exceeded in any calendar year with respect to the beneficiary of the 529 plan. These other gifts would include outright gifts and certain gifts to trusts benefitting the beneficiary for which the annual exclusion may be available. If trusts are involved, it is advisable to consult with your estate planning attorney or accountant to ensure that gifts to 529 plans do not cause you to exceed the annual exclusion limits for any particular year.
Donors who have already maximized their annual exclusion gifts might want to consider direct payments for a beneficiary's education expenses, rather than a 529 plan investment. Under Section 2503(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, direct tuition payments to educational institutions (at all levels) are exempt from the federal gift tax without regard to the annual gift tax exclusion limitation. However, such donors also might conclude that gifts to a 529 plan are a worthy use of their gift and estate tax exemption because of the income tax savings opportunity.
|Limitation to Education
Savings in 529 plan accounts can be used for tuition, books, and other education-related expenses (which now includes the cost of the purchase of any computer technology, related equipment and/or related services such as internet) at most accredited two- and four-year colleges and universities (including for post-graduate programs), U.S. vocational-technical schools, and eligible foreign institutions. A withdrawal that is made for anything other than education-related expenses will be subject to a 10 percent penalty on the earnings portion of the nonqualified withdrawal (distributions are allocated between principal/contribution and earnings on a pro-rata basis). Ordinary income taxes will also have to be paid on the earnings. However, a beneficiary receiving a scholarship may be eligible for an exception to the 10 percent penalty. In that case, money can be withdrawn from a 529 plan up to the amount of a tax-free scholarship without paying the 10 percent penalty, but the earnings portion of the withdrawal would still be subject to income tax.
|Beneficiary Designation
The owner of a 529 plan (sometimes referred to as the participant) will need to name a beneficiary of the plan. An owner may name anyone as a beneficiary, although typically a child or grandchild is named. An owner may change the beneficiary for any reason. This may be desired, for example, if the original intended beneficiary chooses not to attend college or obtains a scholarship and does not need the funds. A change in the beneficiary will not trigger a tax issue if the new beneficiary is a member of the family of the old beneficiary and the new beneficiary is assigned to the same generation as the old beneficiary (for generation skipping transfer tax purposes). Family members include a beneficiary's spouse, siblings, descendants, parents, cousins and others, as defined in Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code. Any change of the beneficiary to a person who is not an eligible member of the family of the current beneficiary is treated as a nonqualified withdrawal subject to income taxes as well as the 10 percent penalty.
|Successor Owner Designation
Each 529 plan owner should be sure to designate a successor owner to the plan in case the owner dies while funds remain in the plan. Some states allow a trust to be named as the successor owner.
|Financial Aid
The way in which a 529 plan affects eligibility for financial aid should be carefully evaluated, since the rules vary depending on a number of factors. Overall, for federal aid, 529 plan assets and withdrawals are treated favorably compared to many other assets. 529 plans owned by parents will not count as parental income for financial aid purposes under the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), whereas other non-529 parental income is counted at 22 percent to 47 percent. Instead, parent-owned 529 plans are counted as a parental asset, however, under the federal formula, only 5.64 percent of parental assets are considered (as opposed to student assets, such as UTMA/UGMA custodial accounts, which are counted at a rate of 20 percent).
The rules apply differently if a grandparent owns a 529 plan. In that case, the asset itself is not reportable for FAFSA, but withdrawals are considered student income.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
8 minute readFalling Back in Love With Certain Estate Planning Strategies in a Falling Interest Rate Environment
9 minute readKey to Transferring the Garden: Review of NY's 2024 Transfer-on-Death Deed Law Provides Model for Pa., NJ
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250