Revisiting Popular Year-End Deferred Charitable Giving Options
We thought it would be worthwhile to remind our readers about popular approaches for significant year-end charitable giving. In particular, this article will review various charitable planning techniques whereby valuable income tax deductions can be generated currently, but the distributions to charitable recipients, and the decision making about which charitable recipients will benefit, may be postponed to later years.
September 28, 2017 at 04:56 PM
8 minute read
We thought it would be worthwhile to remind our readers about popular approaches for significant year-end charitable giving. In particular, this article will review various charitable planning techniques whereby valuable income tax deductions can be generated currently, but the distributions to charitable recipients, and the decision making about which charitable recipients will benefit, may be postponed to later years.
Although charitable gifts can be made throughout the year, the end of the year is a popular time for donors to make final charitable giving decisions. This is mainly because it's the last opportunity to generate an income tax deduction for the year through a charitable gift. Also, as the holiday season gets underway, business affairs tend to slow down thereby providing some donors with the greatest giving capability extra time to reflect on more personal matters which include fulfilling charitable objectives. Of course, in many cases, another factor is that it's the only time of the year for many taxpayers to have a handle on the amount of surplus funds they have available for charitable giving after assessing their net income and expenditures for the year.
For folks who have had a particularly high income year (such as may be the case when a donor's business has had a particularly successful year, or, perhaps, due to a scheduled ROTH IRA conversion), it may be an ideal time to frontload gifts for future years. Such foresight allows a taxpayer to benefit in the current year from an income tax deduction attributable to the charitable contributions to be deployed further down the road. This can be accomplished in a number of ways—such as through a contribution to a donor advised fund, a private foundation, a charitable remainder trust, a charitable lead trust or even a gift of a remainder interest in a house. In considering such potential gifts, donors should check with their tax advisers (or run the numbers themselves) to understand how the potential phase out of their itemized deductions, based on a donor's income tax bracket, as well as general AGI limitations for charitable contributions, might impact the charitable deduction available for 2017. To the extent a deduction for charitable contributions might be limited in any particular year, generally the nondeductible amount will be available for use over the next 5 years as a “carry forward” item.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
8 minute readFalling Back in Love With Certain Estate Planning Strategies in a Falling Interest Rate Environment
9 minute readKey to Transferring the Garden: Review of NY's 2024 Transfer-on-Death Deed Law Provides Model for Pa., NJ
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250