Philadelphia Legal Rates Lowest Among Big Cities
Lawyers in the Philadelphia region charged the lowest average billing rate in the country, according to a legal trends report.
October 05, 2017 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
Looking for low legal rates in a big city? Philadelphia is the place to go, according to a recent report.
Among the 10 largest metropolitan areas, the Philadelphia region had the lowest average billing rate for lawyers, at $245, according to the recently released 2017 Legal Trends Report, from cloud-based practice management platform Clio. The highest average rate, of course, was found in the New York metro area, at $344.
But as a state, Pennsylvania's lawyer rates were actually higher than Philadelphia's, at $257. The rate for nonlawyer legal work was $171 in Pennsylvania, making the average law firm hourly rate $243.
Pennsylvania as a state had the 11th highest average lawyer billing rate in the country. The states with higher rates include New York, California and Maryland, as well as Washington, D.C. When ranked by real hourly rates, which took cost of living in each state into account, Pennsylvania came in 10th, still lower than New York and California, but higher than Maryland or Washington, D.C.
“Being situated in an urban area doesn't necessarily mean being able to charge more” in Pennsylvania, said George Psiharis, of Clio, who worked on the report. “One way or another there is price competition in the Philadelphia metro market.”
Still, law firms generally billed at higher rates in the United States if they worked in an urban area, the report said. Urban lawyers made 25 percent more than their rural counterparts, and urban nonlawyers made 14 percent more than other nonlawyers.
Rates generally grew more in urban areas as well. Urban lawyers raised rates by $31 from 2012 to 2016 on average, compared to $17 for rural lawyers. Nonlawyers in urban areas saw their rates increase by $9, versus just $1 in rural areas.
Rates aside, Pennsylvania was in the middle of the pack when it came to how lawyers used and billed for their time.
Pennsylvania had an average utilization rate—the number of billable hours divided by the full work day—of 30 percent among lawyers and 24 percent among nonlawyers, compared to an average of 29 percent across all firms.
Pennsylvania's collection rate was 88 percent, slightly above the U.S. average of 86 percent; and realization in Pennsylvania—a rate that measures the percentage of billable hours that are invoiced—was at 84 percent, also slightly above the national average of 82 percent.
Applying the national averages to an eight-hour work day, the report estimated that lawyers only did 2.3 hours of billable work each day, and only collected on 1.6 hours of that time.
Psiharis said the average utilization rate was the biggest surprise in compiling the data, showing “a big opportunity for improvement.” The two biggest reasons for low utilization, he said, are law firms spending too much time on non-billable tasks, or getting too little billable legal work from clients. The best way to combat that, he said, is using technology to respond efficiently to client inquiries.
Clio compiled its Legal Trends Report using data from more than 60,000 users of its platform, as well as surveys with nearly 3,000 legal professionals and 2,000 legal services consumers or potential consumers.
Lizzy McLellan writes about the Pennsylvania legal community and the business of law at firms of all sizes. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @LizzyMcLellTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute read'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Phila., Del. Firms Handling UArts' Ch. 7 Petition Fall Far Below Top Bankruptcy Rates
3 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250