Philadelphia Legal Rates Lowest Among Big Cities
Lawyers in the Philadelphia region charged the lowest average billing rate in the country, according to a legal trends report.
October 05, 2017 at 04:48 PM
3 minute read
Looking for low legal rates in a big city? Philadelphia is the place to go, according to a recent report.
Among the 10 largest metropolitan areas, the Philadelphia region had the lowest average billing rate for lawyers, at $245, according to the recently released 2017 Legal Trends Report, from cloud-based practice management platform Clio. The highest average rate, of course, was found in the New York metro area, at $344.
But as a state, Pennsylvania's lawyer rates were actually higher than Philadelphia's, at $257. The rate for nonlawyer legal work was $171 in Pennsylvania, making the average law firm hourly rate $243.
Pennsylvania as a state had the 11th highest average lawyer billing rate in the country. The states with higher rates include New York, California and Maryland, as well as Washington, D.C. When ranked by real hourly rates, which took cost of living in each state into account, Pennsylvania came in 10th, still lower than New York and California, but higher than Maryland or Washington, D.C.
“Being situated in an urban area doesn't necessarily mean being able to charge more” in Pennsylvania, said George Psiharis, of Clio, who worked on the report. “One way or another there is price competition in the Philadelphia metro market.”
Still, law firms generally billed at higher rates in the United States if they worked in an urban area, the report said. Urban lawyers made 25 percent more than their rural counterparts, and urban nonlawyers made 14 percent more than other nonlawyers.
Rates generally grew more in urban areas as well. Urban lawyers raised rates by $31 from 2012 to 2016 on average, compared to $17 for rural lawyers. Nonlawyers in urban areas saw their rates increase by $9, versus just $1 in rural areas.
Rates aside, Pennsylvania was in the middle of the pack when it came to how lawyers used and billed for their time.
Pennsylvania had an average utilization rate—the number of billable hours divided by the full work day—of 30 percent among lawyers and 24 percent among nonlawyers, compared to an average of 29 percent across all firms.
Pennsylvania's collection rate was 88 percent, slightly above the U.S. average of 86 percent; and realization in Pennsylvania—a rate that measures the percentage of billable hours that are invoiced—was at 84 percent, also slightly above the national average of 82 percent.
Applying the national averages to an eight-hour work day, the report estimated that lawyers only did 2.3 hours of billable work each day, and only collected on 1.6 hours of that time.
Psiharis said the average utilization rate was the biggest surprise in compiling the data, showing “a big opportunity for improvement.” The two biggest reasons for low utilization, he said, are law firms spending too much time on non-billable tasks, or getting too little billable legal work from clients. The best way to combat that, he said, is using technology to respond efficiently to client inquiries.
Clio compiled its Legal Trends Report using data from more than 60,000 users of its platform, as well as surveys with nearly 3,000 legal professionals and 2,000 legal services consumers or potential consumers.
Lizzy McLellan writes about the Pennsylvania legal community and the business of law at firms of all sizes. Contact her at [email protected]. On Twitter: @LizzyMcLellTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Phila., Del. Firms Handling UArts' Ch. 7 Petition Fall Far Below Top Bankruptcy Rates
3 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readFacing Demand Surge, Weber Gallagher Adds 7 Transportation Attorneys in Harrisburg
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250