Lawsuit Seeks $87M in Sewer Sale Money From Scranton, Law Firms
The city of Scranton, the Borough of Dunmore in Lackawanna County and two law firms that represented them during the sale of the Scranton Sewer Authority have been sued by a property owner alleging they unlawfully raked in over $87 million from the sale.
October 11, 2017 at 09:33 PM
3 minute read
The city of Scranton, the Borough of Dunmore in Lackawanna County and two law firms that represented them during the sale of the Scranton Sewer Authority have been sued by a property owner alleging they unlawfully raked in over $87 million from the sale.
Scranton resident Anthony R. Moses filed his complaint in the Lackawanna Court of Common Pleas Oct. 5. Moses was formerly part of a class action seeking compensation from the Scranton Sewer Authority (SSA) over the existence of undisclosed sewer lines running under residents' properties without an easement.
His complaint alleges that while the SSA was sold to Pennsylvania American Water in 2016 for $195 million and was supposed to dissolve after the closing of the asset sale, the authority still exists.
After the sale, the SSA placed $17 million in escrow, $12 million of which was set aside for litigation over undisclosed sewer lines. Additionally, Moses alleged the SSA transferred the proceeds of the sale to Scranton and Dunmore—$70 million and $17 million, respectively—in violation of Pennsylvania law prohibiting agencies from spending money outside of that designated for their mission.
“Indeed, the SSA was not permitted to transfer the money it received from the sale to the city or borough until the certificate of termination was filed with the commonwealth and Lackawanna County and all of its outstanding claims were settled, including the pending litigation related to the easements,” the complaint said.
In addition to seeking the return of the money from the municipalities, Moses is going after the money paid to their lawyers as well—$200,000 to Scranton's counsel at Abrahamsen, Conaboy & Abrahamsen, and $256,000 to Dunmore's counsel at Cummings Law.
Moses is represented by Philadelphia-based Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky, which also represented 600 class members in the prior class action.
“The SSA's payment for 'special counsel' for the city and borough as part of the sale of the SSA's assets was not part” of its mission, the complaint said.
Edwin A. Abrahamsen, co-founder of Abrahamsen Conaboy, and Thomas P. Cummings, of Cummings Law, did not immediately respond to calls seeking comment.
“It remains a mystery as to why the SSA was quick to distribute these funds and leave so many loose ends in its wake,” Saltz Mongeluzzi lawyer Patrick Howard said in a statement released by the firm. “We are now acting to protect the interests of Mr. Moses and the other residents affected by these sewer lines. We want to make sure these funds are handled appropriately and administered consistent with state law.”
P.J. D'Annunzio can be contacted at 215-557-2315 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @PJDannunzioTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readVolunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250