Shapiro Appeals Decision Tossing Charges Against Amtrak Engineer
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro continues to seek criminal charges against the Amtrak engineer operating the train that derailed in Philadelphia in 2015.
October 11, 2017 at 12:25 PM
4 minute read
In this May 13, 2015, file photo, emergency personnel work at the scene of a night derailment in Philadelphia of an Amtrak train headed to New York. Amtrak has started settling lawsuits with victims of the deadly derailment in Philadelphia, and lawyers involved in the process say a strict confidentiality provision prevents them from talking about how they're doing or how much money they've received. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro continues to seek criminal charges against the Amtrak engineer operating the train that derailed in Philadelphia in 2015.
On Oct. 10, Shapiro's office filed a notice of appeal in Philadelphia, seeking to overturn a Municipal Court judge's decision to toss the charges against engineer Brandon Bostian.
“The Office of Attorney General has filed its notice of appeal of the Municipal Court decision in the Amtrak case,” office spokesman Joe Grace said in a statement Tuesday. “We are seeking a legal determination based on the proper standard for a preliminary hearing.”
Bostian's attorney, Brian McMonagle, said the Attorney General's Office has to re-file a complaint within the time period allowed by the statute of limitations in order to revive criminal charges.
“Recognizing that the statute has run and they are now time barred from proceeding further, they have desperately attempted to bypass the Pennsylvania Rules of Procedure. We will move to dismiss this illegal appeal,” he continued. “The [Philadelphia] District Attorney investigated this case for two years and determined that no crime was committed. A judge then reviewed the evidence and came to the same conclusion. This is wrong and we intend to put an end to it.”
Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge Thomas Gehret dismissed the charges against Bostian at a Sept. 12 hearing, ruling that there wasn't enough evidence to show a crime had been committed.
“The Amtrak crash was a tragedy and this case has a unique procedural history. We are carefully reviewing the judge's decision, notes of testimony and our prosecutorial responsibilities in this case going forward,” Shapiro had said in a statement after the hearing.
At that time, McMonagle said the only possible explanation for the accident was that Bostian was distracted by a distress call from another train engineer whose train had been attacked by assailants throwing rocks. Bostian, according to McMonagle, then sped up to over 100 miles per hour because he thought he had reached a high-speed zone.
“Today the judge came to the same conclusion that was reached by the District Attorney's Office after investigation for two years; that this was an accident and not a crime,” McMonagle said.
The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office originally declined to pursue charges against Bostian.
The office announced in May, “We have no evidence that the engineer acted with criminal 'intent' or criminal 'knowledge' within the special meaning of those terms under Pennsylvania law for purposes of criminal charges. Nor do we believe there is sufficient evidence to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, criminal recklessness, which would be the only other basis for criminal liability.”
However, Thomas Kline and Robert Mongeluzzi, the Philadelphia plaintiffs attorneys who handled the civil lawsuits related to the derailment, along with prominent Philadelphia attorney Richard Sprague, filed two private criminal complaints on behalf of the victims' families.
The next day, Municipal Court President Judge Marsha Neifield ordered the District Attorney's Office to bring charges, but that office ultimately referred the matter to the Attorney General's Office, which filed charges against Bostian just before the statute of limitations ran out.
In a joint statement responding to the Oct. 10 appeal from Shapiro's office, Kline and Mongeluzzi said, “The victims of Amtrak 188 are gratified to see the Pennsylvania attorney general's appeal of a ruling which we believe to have been fundamentally flawed given the standard for a preliminary hearing and the facts and circumstances of Mr. Bostian operating a train at 106 miles an hour in a 50 mile-an-hour zone, which caused so much human devastation and death.”
P.J. D'Annunzio can be contacted at 215-557-2315 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @PJDannunzioTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
- 2Defense Counsel Turns $2.2 Million Broward Jury Verdict to $500K
- 3United Soccer League Scores General Counsel
- 4Matt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
- 5The Essential Role of Partnership Agreements in Health Care Private Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250