Prof Fired Over Hitler Parody Meme Can Proceed With Breach of Contract Suit
A former professor who was fired after creating an online parody video depicting faculty members as Nazis can proceed with his breach of contract claims against the university where he worked, a federal court in Pennsylvania has ruled.
October 12, 2017 at 06:33 PM
3 minute read
A former professor who was fired after creating an online parody video depicting faculty members as Nazis can proceed with his breach of contract claims against the university where he worked, a federal court in Pennsylvania has ruled.
The teacher, Frederick Fagal, a tenured professor at Marywood University, a Roman Catholic institution, was fired after he created video adaptations of the 2004 German language film “Downfall,” which depicts the last few days of Adolf Hitler's rule. The adaptation included replacing the English subtitles with his own subtitles mocking faculty members, including referring to the university's president, Sister Anne Munley, as “FuhrMunley.”
The videos were posted on YouTube, where numerous other videos similarly replacing the subtitles from “Downfall” with mock dialogue have also been created and posted. So-called “Downfall” videos became a popular internet meme several years ago, where subtitles have been replaced to parody everything from National Football League Commissioner Roger Goodell to the subprime mortgage crisis and even the “Downfall” meme itself.
According to U.S. District Judge Richard Caputo of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the professor argued that he created the video as a means of supporting “open discussion and unrestricted exchange of ideas” in the wake of a dispute he had with the faculty, but the school contended that the conduct went against the school's core values.
“This dispute, illustrating the subjective understandings of the contract, and the expectations flowing from it, are the reason why assessments of materiality are 'inherently problematic,'” Caputo said, in denying summary judgment motions filed by both sides.
The contract claims, according to Caputo, could be traced back to November 2011, when Fagal invited a representative of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education to speak at the school about free speech on college campuses. He had put up several posters advertising the event, but school personnel removed some of the posters. The school refused to reimburse Fagal, or apologize for removing the signs, Caputo said.
In January 2012, Fagal sent an email from his personal email address to school faculty members about the posters. The message included links to the YouTube videos he'd created.
Along with referring to the school president as FuhrMunley, the videos, which showed Hitler chastising several lieutenants, also depicted the school's vice president of academic affairs, who is Jewish, as a Nazi, and referenced “a nonexistent plot to have the Fagal character seduced and then accused of rape,” Caputo said.
After learning about the videos, Munley took actions to suspend Fagal and have his contract terminated. The school stopped paying Fagal after August 2012, however, Fagal contended that Munley circumvented the appropriate disciplinary process, and therefore breached the contract.
According to Caputo, the dispositive issue on summary judgment boiled down to what each party believed was the purpose of Fagal's employment contract. The school argued the contract was derived from the core values and mission of the school, but Fagal contended the purpose of his contract was to promote open discussion, so Caputo determined it would be premature to grant summary judgment.
Stephanie Peet of Jackson Lewis, who is representing Marywood University, declined to comment. Attorney Jonathan Cohen of Wayne, who is representing the plaintiff, did not return a call seeking comment.
Max Mitchell can be contacted at 215-557-2354 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250