To Become a Better Appellate Lawyer, You Should Read This Book
You may be surprised to learn that one of the most useful and informative practice guides for attorneys and law students interested in appellate practice had its origin here in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
October 16, 2017 at 04:23 PM
12 minute read
Upon Further Review
You may be surprised to learn that one of the most useful and informative practice guides for attorneys and law students interested in appellate practice had its origin here in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The book is titled “Winning on Appeal: Better Briefs & Oral Argument,” and its author was senior Third Circuit Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert.
The premise for the book, in Aldisert's words, was that if you wanted to learn how to catch fish, who better to give you the best possible perspective than the fish itself? To win on appeal, attorneys must write briefs and deliver oral arguments intended to persuade appellate judges that the attorneys' client should win the appeal. Aldisert's book was perhaps one of the first to try to educate attorneys on how to succeed on appeal from the perspective of a highly experienced appellate judge who would know better than anyone what works and what doesn't.
The first edition of the book appeared on the scene in 1992, which was propitious timing insofar as my career as an appellate practitioner was concerned. From 1989 through 1991, I was serving a judicial clerkship for Third Circuit Judge William D. Hutchinson. The appellate briefs that I read and the oral arguments that I observed during my two-year clerkship gave me an inkling that being an appellate lawyer might just be something that I could be good at.
The clerkship also allowed me to see from the judicial perspective what worked and what didn't work when it came to good advocacy on appeal. And yet, after my clerkship, I was still just a brand new lawyer only two years removed from law school graduation, so having a detailed practice guide written by one of the Third Circuit's most experienced and highly regarded judges often proved indispensable in helping me persuade more senior lawyers concerning how to approach appellate brief-writing and oral argument.
In 2003, Aldisert published the second edition of “Winning on Appeal.” By then, I had been an appellate attorney in private practice for nearly a dozen years, and my reputation for doing good work and knowing a thing or two about how to succeed on appeal was beginning to grow. To my great delight, Aldisert decided to include me among the many lawyers and judges who offered nuggets of advice that were quoted in the second edition of the book. Regardless of how out of place I may have felt to have my advice included right next to advice from lawyers and judges who were the titans of appellate practice, there it was nonetheless.
Sadly, in December 2014, Aldisert passed away at the age of 95. He lived a very full life and accomplished what would later be impossible, relocating his own Third Circuit chambers from Pittsburgh to California for health reasons. In addition to having penned a memoir, he had written numerous other well-known books, including a book on logic for lawyers and opinion writing for judges.
The second edition of Aldisert's “Winning on Appeal” book took a little over 10 years to arrive, and now that Aldisert had passed away, the prospects of another updated edition of this extremely helpful practice guide looked quite bleak indeed. Happily, law professor Tessa L. Dysart and Fifth Circuit Judge Leslie H. Southwick, formerly a judge on the Mississippi Court of Appeals, agreed to join forces to bring into existence a brand new third edition of “Winning on Appeal,” which has just become available for purchase.
The book retains its Third Circuit connection, not only because so much of what Aldisert originally wrote remains intact, but also because the book's brand new foreword is written by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., a former Third Circuit judge who retains a strong knowledge of the history of his former court. The third edition also retains several nuggets of advice from me.
Because a party's appellate brief(s) ordinarily play the most significant role in the outcome of any appeal, approximately two-thirds of the book is devoted to planning and executing a well-written and persuasive brief. The remainder of the book focuses on preparing for and delivering the oral argument of an appeal. If you think that you are someone who already knows all there is to know about these subjects, then you are probably most in need of what this book has to offer. And it almost goes without saying that if you realize your skills as an appellate advocate are still capable of improvement, which is certainly something that is true for all of us, then this book unquestionably can provide helpful guidance and assistance.
In addition to furnishing advice and suggestions from numerous federal and state appellate judges, including Pennsylvania's own Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor, the book also contains advice from numerous, highly regarded appellate attorneys. I can't think of any other appellate practice guide where one would find advice from attorneys Paul D. Clement, Seth P. Waxman, Miguel A. Estrada, Kyle Duncan (recently nominated to the Fifth Circuit), Peter Keisler and Scott Keller, to name just a few.
As with any other practice book, “Winning on Appeal” is not going to write your appellate briefs or deliver your appellate oral arguments for you. Nevertheless, given how many attorneys enjoy handling cases on appeal and seek to become as good at it as possible, this book definitely can provide you with the ideas and advice necessary to excel as an appellate advocate. What you do with that advice is of course up to you, but it's far better to have it in mind then never to have considered it.
I cannot think of any other single book that is more focused on how to successfully handle an appeal from start to finish from the practitioner's perspective. To be sure, whether any specific piece of advice should be followed in your particular appeal is something that only you as the advocate can decide. But, as I said at the outset, this is a book that I have been glad to have by my side throughout my career as an appellate advocate, and I am confident you will feel the same way, too.
Howard J. Bashman operates his own appellate litigation boutique in Willow Grove and can be reached at 215-830-1458 and via email at [email protected]. You can access his appellate web log at http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/ and via Twitter @howappealing.
Upon Further Review
You may be surprised to learn that one of the most useful and informative practice guides for attorneys and law students interested in appellate practice had its origin here in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The book is titled “Winning on Appeal: Better Briefs & Oral Argument,” and its author was senior Third Circuit Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert.
The premise for the book, in Aldisert's words, was that if you wanted to learn how to catch fish, who better to give you the best possible perspective than the fish itself? To win on appeal, attorneys must write briefs and deliver oral arguments intended to persuade appellate judges that the attorneys' client should win the appeal. Aldisert's book was perhaps one of the first to try to educate attorneys on how to succeed on appeal from the perspective of a highly experienced appellate judge who would know better than anyone what works and what doesn't.
The first edition of the book appeared on the scene in 1992, which was propitious timing insofar as my career as an appellate practitioner was concerned. From 1989 through 1991, I was serving a judicial clerkship for Third Circuit Judge William D. Hutchinson. The appellate briefs that I read and the oral arguments that I observed during my two-year clerkship gave me an inkling that being an appellate lawyer might just be something that I could be good at.
The clerkship also allowed me to see from the judicial perspective what worked and what didn't work when it came to good advocacy on appeal. And yet, after my clerkship, I was still just a brand new lawyer only two years removed from law school graduation, so having a detailed practice guide written by one of the Third Circuit's most experienced and highly regarded judges often proved indispensable in helping me persuade more senior lawyers concerning how to approach appellate brief-writing and oral argument.
In 2003, Aldisert published the second edition of “Winning on Appeal.” By then, I had been an appellate attorney in private practice for nearly a dozen years, and my reputation for doing good work and knowing a thing or two about how to succeed on appeal was beginning to grow. To my great delight, Aldisert decided to include me among the many lawyers and judges who offered nuggets of advice that were quoted in the second edition of the book. Regardless of how out of place I may have felt to have my advice included right next to advice from lawyers and judges who were the titans of appellate practice, there it was nonetheless.
Sadly, in December 2014, Aldisert passed away at the age of 95. He lived a very full life and accomplished what would later be impossible, relocating his own Third Circuit chambers from Pittsburgh to California for health reasons. In addition to having penned a memoir, he had written numerous other well-known books, including a book on logic for lawyers and opinion writing for judges.
The second edition of Aldisert's “Winning on Appeal” book took a little over 10 years to arrive, and now that Aldisert had passed away, the prospects of another updated edition of this extremely helpful practice guide looked quite bleak indeed. Happily, law professor Tessa L. Dysart and Fifth Circuit Judge
The book retains its Third Circuit connection, not only because so much of what Aldisert originally wrote remains intact, but also because the book's brand new foreword is written by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., a former Third Circuit judge who retains a strong knowledge of the history of his former court. The third edition also retains several nuggets of advice from me.
Because a party's appellate brief(s) ordinarily play the most significant role in the outcome of any appeal, approximately two-thirds of the book is devoted to planning and executing a well-written and persuasive brief. The remainder of the book focuses on preparing for and delivering the oral argument of an appeal. If you think that you are someone who already knows all there is to know about these subjects, then you are probably most in need of what this book has to offer. And it almost goes without saying that if you realize your skills as an appellate advocate are still capable of improvement, which is certainly something that is true for all of us, then this book unquestionably can provide helpful guidance and assistance.
In addition to furnishing advice and suggestions from numerous federal and state appellate judges, including Pennsylvania's own Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor, the book also contains advice from numerous, highly regarded appellate attorneys. I can't think of any other appellate practice guide where one would find advice from attorneys Paul D. Clement, Seth P. Waxman, Miguel A. Estrada, Kyle Duncan (recently nominated to the Fifth Circuit), Peter Keisler and Scott Keller, to name just a few.
As with any other practice book, “Winning on Appeal” is not going to write your appellate briefs or deliver your appellate oral arguments for you. Nevertheless, given how many attorneys enjoy handling cases on appeal and seek to become as good at it as possible, this book definitely can provide you with the ideas and advice necessary to excel as an appellate advocate. What you do with that advice is of course up to you, but it's far better to have it in mind then never to have considered it.
I cannot think of any other single book that is more focused on how to successfully handle an appeal from start to finish from the practitioner's perspective. To be sure, whether any specific piece of advice should be followed in your particular appeal is something that only you as the advocate can decide. But, as I said at the outset, this is a book that I have been glad to have by my side throughout my career as an appellate advocate, and I am confident you will feel the same way, too.
Howard J. Bashman operates his own appellate litigation boutique in Willow Grove and can be reached at 215-830-1458 and via email at [email protected]. You can access his appellate web log at http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/ and via Twitter @howappealing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
3 minute readSuperior Court Rejects Pa. Hospital's Challenge to $7.3M Med Mal Judgment
3 minute readPa. Appeals Court: Trial Judge Dismissed Med Mal Claims Without Giving Plaintiffs Proper Time to Fight Back
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 122-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 2Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
- 3FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
- 4Greenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
- 5DC Circuit Rejects Jan. 6 Defendants’ Claim That Pepper Spray Isn't Dangerous Weapon
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250