$15.5M Awarded to Pedestrian Hit by Drunken Trucker
A man who was severely injured when he was hit on the side of the road by a commercial truck operated by a drunken driver has been awarded $15.5 million…
October 17, 2017 at 05:50 PM
6 minute read
A man who was severely injured when he was hit on the side of the road by a commercial truck operated by a drunken driver has been awarded $15.5 million by a Philadelphia jury.
The jury in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Linda Carpenter's courtroom handed up the verdict to plaintiff Issac Espinoza on Tuesday afternoon after three hours of deliberation in the third week of trial.
Espinoza alleged that trucking company J.B. Hunt negligently hired outside contract driver Ricky Hatfield by not thoroughly checking into his background. According to Espinoza's court papers, Hatfield, who is currently in prison after being convicted on charges stemming from the accident, had a history of DUI, fleeing from police and was once fired from a previous job for failing a drug test.
The jury found J.B. Hunt 40 percent negligent and Hatfield 60 percent negligent. The verdict was broken down into approximately $12.2 million for economic damages, along with pain and suffering, and $3.3 million for loss of consortium for Espinoza's wife.
Espinoza was represented by Alan Feldman, Daniel Mann and Edward Goldis of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter Tanner Weinstock Dodig in Philadelphia.
Feldman said his client suffered catastrophic injuries including a shredded diaphragm, a paralyzed right arm and other maladies that necessitate constant assistance to perform daily activities. He also said Espinoza attempted suicide twice since being injured.
As for the verdict, Feldman said, “We're very pleased that this verdict will permit our client to have his medical treatment needs taken care of for the rest of his life. And we hope this verdict sends a message to the trucking industry about the urgent need to background check all drivers before they get behind the wheel of a tractor-trailer.”
Gary N. Stewart of Rawle & Henderson in Harrisburg represented J.B. Hunt and did not return a call seeking comment. Nor did Hatfield's attorney, George McCool of Wright & O'Donnell in Conshohocken.
According to Hatfield's court papers, his company's insurance would pay for $1 million of Espinoza's costs. But that offer, although supported by the plaintiffs, was shot down by the court.
J.B. Hunt argued that it had no liability for the accident because Hatfield was an independent contractor. It was the Hatfield company's duty to make sure its drivers were up to par, according to J.B. Hunt's court papers.
“At the time of the accident, neither Ricky Hatfield nor Hatfield trucking was hauling a load for J.B. Hunt,” J.B. Hunt claimed. “They were not on their way to pick up a load for J.B. Hunt. Rather, Ricky Hatfield testified that it was his day off.”
P.J. D'Annunzio can be contacted at 215-557-2315 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @PJDannunzioTLI.
A man who was severely injured when he was hit on the side of the road by a commercial truck operated by a drunken driver has been awarded $15.5 million by a Philadelphia jury.
The jury in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Linda Carpenter's courtroom handed up the verdict to plaintiff Issac Espinoza on Tuesday afternoon after three hours of deliberation in the third week of trial.
Espinoza alleged that trucking company J.B. Hunt negligently hired outside contract driver Ricky Hatfield by not thoroughly checking into his background. According to Espinoza's court papers, Hatfield, who is currently in prison after being convicted on charges stemming from the accident, had a history of DUI, fleeing from police and was once fired from a previous job for failing a drug test.
The jury found J.B. Hunt 40 percent negligent and Hatfield 60 percent negligent. The verdict was broken down into approximately $12.2 million for economic damages, along with pain and suffering, and $3.3 million for loss of consortium for Espinoza's wife.
Espinoza was represented by Alan Feldman, Daniel Mann and Edward Goldis of
Feldman said his client suffered catastrophic injuries including a shredded diaphragm, a paralyzed right arm and other maladies that necessitate constant assistance to perform daily activities. He also said Espinoza attempted suicide twice since being injured.
As for the verdict, Feldman said, “We're very pleased that this verdict will permit our client to have his medical treatment needs taken care of for the rest of his life. And we hope this verdict sends a message to the trucking industry about the urgent need to background check all drivers before they get behind the wheel of a tractor-trailer.”
Gary N. Stewart of
According to Hatfield's court papers, his company's insurance would pay for $1 million of Espinoza's costs. But that offer, although supported by the plaintiffs, was shot down by the court.
J.B. Hunt argued that it had no liability for the accident because Hatfield was an independent contractor. It was the Hatfield company's duty to make sure its drivers were up to par, according to J.B. Hunt's court papers.
“At the time of the accident, neither Ricky Hatfield nor Hatfield trucking was hauling a load for J.B. Hunt,” J.B. Hunt claimed. “They were not on their way to pick up a load for J.B. Hunt. Rather, Ricky Hatfield testified that it was his day off.”
P.J. D'Annunzio can be contacted at 215-557-2315 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @PJDannunzioTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
3 minute readPhila. Judge Rules $12M Crash Verdict Was Backed by Evidence as Case Heads to Appeal
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Reflects on Client's $1M Win Against Officers' No-Knock Search Warrant
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250