Phila. DA Hopefuls Aim to Avoid Defense Bar Donor Trap That Snared Manhattan DA
In the wake of revelations that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. dropped two probes involving high profile-targets whose attorneys donated large sums to his campaign, the issue of having defense attorneys donate to district attorneys' political campaigns has come under scrutiny.
October 19, 2017 at 05:18 PM
5 minute read
In the wake of revelations that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. dropped two probes involving high profile-targets whose attorneys donated large sums to his campaign, the issue of having defense attorneys donate to district attorneys' political campaigns has come under scrutiny.
In Philadelphia, the contributions defense attorneys have made to the two candidates seeking to become the city's next top prosecutor pale in comparison to the numbers seen in Manhattan. But both candidates said that, if elected, they plan to avoid meetings with defense attorneys regarding individual cases, and would only do so with additional members of their staff present.
Larry Krasner.“Ordinarily, my presence won't be required in relation to a specific case,” Democratic candidate Larry Krasner said in an emailed statement. “On the rare occasions when it is, any such meeting would be attended by multiple staff and handled consistent with the transparency and accountability we are committed to providing. The public is entitled to know that nothing inappropriate is occurring.”
Republican candidate Beth Grossman also said that, if there ever was a legitimate concern that warranted her direct attention, she would never agree to a closed-door meeting. Along with bringing in her deputies, she said she plans to have all attorneys who request a direct meeting to outline in a letter why they want the meeting and what the meeting would be about.
“I don't think closed-door meetings are appropriate. You're going to run into trouble no matter what you do,” she said. “Everybody has the right to contribute to whichever campaign they want to. Will it ever affect my view on a case? Absolutely not. That's totally inappropriate.”
Grossman said the issue might not be as significant with her campaign, since only a handful of defense lawyers donated to her campaign. According to campaign finance records, Grossman received a total of $11,000 in donations from attorneys since the beginning of the year, with contributions topping out at $1,000 for seven donors.
Krasner has seen significantly more donations from attorneys, although none of those donors hail from the criminal defense bar. In the past year, Krasner has received more than $113,000 from lawyers, according to campaign finance records.
A total of 81 attorneys, with practices ranging from bicycle crashes to labor disputes, gave at least $250 to Krasner's campaign since the beginning of the year. Of those attorneys about 40 had practices that dealt at least in part with criminal defense.
According to the records, civil litigation firm Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel had the biggest contribution by a law firm, with $10,000. Donations from the name partners of Cohen, Placitella & Roth, which focuses on personal injury, also equaled $10,000.
Of the top spending individual attorneys were Shannon Fisk of Earthjustice, who donated $6,000, and civil litigation attorney Vernon Anastasio, who gave $5,500 in the past year, according to campaign finance reports.
The criminal defense lawyer donating the most in the past year was Gary Silver, who donated $4,500, campaign finance records show. Other notable defense attorneys who contributed to Krasner's campaign included Jack McMahon, who gave $2,000, and Guy Sciolla, who gave $3,500. Twenty-one attorneys with criminal defense practices gave less than $1,000.
Krasner's campaign has raised a total of $520,725 through direct contributions, according to the campaign finance reports. That number does not take into account the spending of independent groups supporting Krasner, like the $1.45 million a George Soros-linked political action committee used for activities supporting Krasner's primary campaign.
In an emailed response to questions posed by The Legal, Krasner noted that “attorneys wear many hats during their careers,” often going back and forth between the prosecution and defense sides, and that, although some defense attorneys may have contributed to his campaign, if elected his office would also handle cases involving attorneys who contributed to Grossman's campaign, or who did not donate to any candidate.
“Defendants who are represented by attorneys who donated to this campaign will be treated the same as every other defendant in the tens of thousands of cases handled by the approximately 300 attorneys in the District Attorney's Office. The same with victims or witnesses in those cases,” he said in an emailed statement. “My office will evaluate their cases and exercise discretion fairly and appropriately regardless of the attorney in all cases.”
Recent media reports revealed that Vance's office dropped investigations into sex assault and harassment allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, and also dropped an investigation into fraud allegations against Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr.
In the weeks since the reports have come to light, Vance said he would “rethink” allowing his campaign to accept donations from defense attorneys, and announced he would have an outside audit of his campaign donations.
Max Mitchell can be contacted at 215-557-2354 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOne Word May Make All the Difference for Lifers Convicted of Felony Murder
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250