Georgia Plaintiff Sues Penn State for Barring White Nationalist's Speech
Penn State is the latest to be hit with a free-speech lawsuit after rejecting a request for prominent white nationalist Richard Spencer to speak on campus.
October 20, 2017 at 02:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
Pennsylvania State University is the latest to be hit with a free-speech lawsuit after rejecting a request for prominent white nationalist Richard Spencer to speak on campus.
According to the complaint, filed Oct. 19 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, plaintiff Cameron Padgett, a Georgia man in charge of coordinating Spencer's campus speaking tour, reached out to the university in July attempting to rent a conference room or lecture hall for a speech by Spencer.
The suit names the Penn State Board of Trustees and university president Eric Barron as defendants.
Spencer, the president of the National Policy Institute, was one of the promoters of the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, that turned deadly in August when marchers clashed with protesters.
On Aug. 22, Barron issued a statement on behalf of the university, calling Spencer's views “abhorrent and contradictory to our university's values,” but adding: “After critical assessment by campus police, in consultation with state and federal law enforcement officials, we have determined that Mr. Spencer is not welcome on our campus, as this event at this time presents a major security risk to students, faculty, staff and visitors to campus. It is the likelihood of disruption and violence, not the content, however odious, that drives our decision.”
However, Padgett, in his complaint, alleged the threat of violence was coming solely from the Antifa—short for “antifascist”—movement, directed at Spencer and his supporters.
“Defendants' decision to prohibit plaintiff from renting a conference room or lecture hall
on PSU's campus due to violence implicitly or explicitly threatened by Antifa and not by the
speaker constitutes unconstitutional content discrimination in the form of a heckler's veto,” Padgett said in the complaint.
Penn State is not the first university to scuttle Padgett's efforts to book a Spencer speech. Nor is it the first to face a free-speech challenge from Padgett.
Texas A&M University, the University of Florida and Auburn University are among those that rejected requests to host Spencer on their campuses. But a federal judge in Alabama issued a preliminary injunction ordering Auburn to allow Spencer to rent a room on campus for his speech—and to pay for security—and the University of Florida ultimately made its own decision to relent, saying it was legally obligated to let Spencer speak.
In his complaint, Padgett said the current situation at Penn State is “virtually identical” to the situation at Auburn.
“Just like Auburn University, the PSU defendants of the instant civil action must permit plaintiff to rent a conference room or lecture hall for Spencer to speak about alt-right philosophy on PSU's campus if the First and Fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution are to be respected,” the complaint said, adding that “this court can and should issue preliminary and permanent injunctions against defendants whereby defendants are ordered to permit plaintiff to rent a conference room or lecture hall on the campus of PSU for a fee to host Spencer as a speaker without plaintiff paying for police protection or posting bond or providing insurance for the event and which requires PSU to maintain law and order via the use of law enforcement officers of its police department so as to protect Spencer's right to safely speak in a meaningful manner.”
The suit alleges First and 14th amendment free-speech violations and also includes a claim for punitive damages “because defendants caused harm to plaintiff that was malicious, oppressive, and/or in reckless disregard of plaintiff's rights.”
Padgett's attorney, Jordan Rushie of Rushie Law in Philadelphia, noting the protests that occurred during Spencer's speech at the University of Florida on Oct. 19. said Penn State is doing a disservice to its students by denying those who disagree with Spencer the opportunity to express themselves.
“The First Amendment exists to protect speech that people don't necessarily like, agree with, [or that they] find offensive or even hateful,” Rushie said.
A spokesperson for Penn State said it was the university's policy not to comment on pending litigation.
Zack Needles can be contacted at 215-557-2373 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @ZackNeedlesTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250