Judge With 2016 DUI Arrest Chosen to Head Pittsburgh's Civil Division
The Allegheny County judge set to take over as the Fifth Judicial District's administrative judge was arrested last year on a DUI charge.
October 23, 2017 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
The Allegheny County judge set to take over as the Fifth Judicial District's administrative judge was arrested last year on a DUI charge.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently announced that, starting Nov. 1, Allegheny County Judge Christine Ward will become the court's new administrative judge of the civil division, replacing Judge Ronald Folino, who has headed the civil division since December 2013. An order from the Supreme Court outlining the change accompanied the announcement Oct. 20.
Ward, however, was charged with driving under the influence last summer, and was sentenced to Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition in September 2016. According to a report from TribLive, Ward's law license was not suspended, but she had to complete safe-driving courses and pay nearly $2,250 in court costs and program fees.
Ward did not return a call for comment Monday.
According to the TribLive article, under the terms of her sentence Ward had the opportunity to ask the court to expunge the charges if she successfully completed the program.
A search of online criminal records from the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas on Monday showed no record of Ward's case.
In a July 2016 article, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette cited a police affidavit saying that Ward had been pulled over in O'Hara Township on July 3, 2016, after there was a report of an erratic driver along Route 28. The report said Ward fell over during a traffic stop, had trouble following instructions and told police that she had “too much” to drink, according to the newspaper. The paper also noted that Ward was taken to UPMC St. Margaret, where she refused to submit to a blood test.
TribLive's story from September 2016 noted that, along with paying the court costs and fees, Ward was sentenced to spend six months in a probation program for nonviolent first-time offenders. That story said Ward could ask the court to expunge her charges if she completed the program, and noted that she had neither recused from, nor been reassigned from any cases following the incident, since she handles civil cases.
A spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts said in an emailed statement that “administrative judges are selected by the court based on the justices' confidence in their ability to fulfill the duties. Once chosen, the judge is responsible for the efficient operation of their respective division.”
Allegheny County President Judge Jeffrey Manning did not return a message seeking comment Monday.
According to the Supreme Court's announcement, Ward joined the bench in March 2003 and was assigned to the juvenile court. In 2007, she was transferred to the civil division, where she became one of two Allegheny County judges overseeing the commerce court, which had recently been formed. The announcement noted that Ward is expected to continue being involved with the commerce court, despite her recent reassignment as administrative judge.
Folino, whom Ward is set to replace, was elected to the bench in 1993. After being assigned to the family division, he was transferred to the civil division in 1997, and became the administrative judge in December 2013, the announcement said. Folino, according to the announcement, plans to retire soon.
The new administrative judge for the civil division is not the only change for leadership at the Fifth Judicial District announced Oct. 20.
The Supreme Court also announced that Judge Kim Eaton has been selected as the new administrative judge of the family division.
Eaton, who joined the court in January 2000, is set to replace Judge Kim Berkeley Clark, who joined the court in March 1999. According to the announcement, Clark plans to remain a family court judge and is set to hear juvenile cases.
Max Mitchell can be contacted at 215-557-2354 or [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250