K&L Gates Gets 'Hands-On' With Blockchain Development
Hoping to get out in front of a major new technology, the firm is preparing to create its own private blockchain.
October 24, 2017 at 03:59 PM
3 minute read
Maksim Kabakou/Shutterstock.com
K&L Gates is making a bet on blockchain, a technology that could take on a major role in contracts and other legal applications.
The Pittsburgh-based global law firm has put a plan in place to develop blockchain capabilities in-house, eventually allowing the firm to launch its own private blockchain.
While it has a number of applications, blockchain became widely known through the spread of the virtual currency Bitcoin, which relies on the still-evolving technology. K&L Gates plans to start with smart contracts, which use encrypted information on blockchain to implement the terms of a contract automatically.
To begin, K&L Gates is working with Chainvine, a technology company based in the United Kingdom and Sweden, to provide its lawyers with blockchain modules so they can learn the technology. That will allow K&L Gates lawyers to become familiar with using blockchain in a “sandbox” environment, said partner Judith Rinearson, who co-chair's the firm's fintech practice.
From there, they will work with clients and Chainvine to create “use cases“—a set of steps for each type of action—and eventually establish a private blockchain, she said. It will likely take about a year to reach that point, Rinearson said, with the sandbox stage lasting three to six months.
“Our lawyers are all really excited about this,” she said. “Until you actually touch [blockchain] yourself, it's really hard to get a handle on it.”
According to K&L Gates, few if any law firms have gone as far as creating a private blockchain. Some other kinds of businesses have done so.
Rinearson said she and her colleagues considered other options that would give them access to the technology, like joining a consortium, but they ultimately chose to take a more “hands-on” approach. The firm will likely expand its use of blockchain as it becomes more familiar, she said.
“We're unusual for a law firm. We do have coders on staff,” Rinearson said. “It's the very beginning of this new technology, which many people believe that it's going to make a profound change in how we do business and how we service our clients.”
Combined with artificial intelligence, blockchain has the potential to change how lawyers work with clients, particularly on contracts, she said, but it's doubtful that lawyers will be cut out of the process.
“Things like negotiating a contract, understanding the terms, all those pieces I don't think you're going to be able to replace,” Rinearson said. Still, she added “these are changing times and that's why I think as a law firm serving clients it's important to understand it and be on top of it.”
Several firms have created blockchain legal practices.
An associate at Morris, Manning & Martin in Atlanta recently started his own practice area focused on blockchain-specific issues. Perkins Coie and Cooley also have blockchain practice groups, which include securities, tax, corporate and technology lawyers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250