After Crash, Insurer Denied Car-Owner Permitted Friend to Drive
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WhitePlaintiffs VerdictDate of Verdict: Oct. 3.Court and Case No.: U.S. District Court,…
October 26, 2017 at 05:20 PM
4 minute read
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. White
Plaintiffs Verdict
Date of Verdict:
Oct. 3.
Court and Case No.:
U.S. District Court, M.D. Pa.
Judge:
Christopher C. Conner.
Type of Action:
Insurance coverage.
Injuries:
Motor vehicle.
Plaintiffs Counsel:
Matthew F. Dolfi, Robb Leonard Mulvihill, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel:
Michael J. Pykosh and Brett Flower, Dethlefs-Pykosh Law Group, Camp Hill; Matthew S. Crosby; Handler, Henning & Rosenberg, Harrisburg.
Comment:
On July 10, 2012, plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. was the insurer of a sedan owned by Lisa Gracey. At about 1 a.m., Bryant White was driving Gracey's sedan on Route 915, in Fulton County. He lost control of the car, left the road, and struck a tree head-on. White was killed, as was Gracey's son, Cody Gracey, a front-seat passenger. Sitting in the rear seats were Cheyenne Hege and William Hess, who both suffered severe injuries.
Hege and Hess had originally sued White's estate, Gracey, and her daughter, Morgen Gracey, seeking coverage for their injuries and treatment; however, the lawsuits were stayed after State Farm filed for a declaratory judgment against White's estate, Hege, and Hess. Whether Hege and Hess could proceed in their actions was dependent on the outcome of a jury trial to determine whether White had implied permission to use Lisa Gracey's car.
At trial, State Farm maintained that White did not have implied permission, and therefore the insurer had no duty to indemnify Hess and Hege, or to defend White, since he did not have permission from Lisa Gracey, the owner of the vehicle, to drive it.
Lisa Gracey had permitted her daughter, Morgen, to use the car. Lisa Gracey testified that when she purchased the car, in May 2012, she told her daughter that only Morgen was allowed to drive it. At the time of the accident, Morgen was dating White.
Morgen Gracey testified that, on the night of the accident, she, Cody Gracey, White, Hege, and Hess were outside her house and got into an argument, which prompted Hess to leave. Morgen Gracey claimed that she became ill, which prompted her to go inside to use the bathroom. Before she went outside, she told everyone not to use her car to go after Hess. White, however, disobeyed her orders and got behind the wheel of her car, along with Cody Gracey, Hege, and later Hess.
Counsel for Hess and Hege maintained that White had implied permission since he had driven Gracey's car on multiple occasions, and with Hess and Hege present. Lisa Gracey had given uncontrolled use of her car to her daughter, and so Morgen Gracey could give consent to others, including White, their counsel asserted. In addition to Hess and Hege's testimonies, other witnesses testified that they had seen White driving around town in Gracey's car.
Hess and Hege's counsel relied on the testimony of an investigating state trooper, who testified that White had alcohol in his system at the time of the crash. The court precluded the trooper from disclosing White's blood-alcohol content, since he was not a toxicologist.
Counsel for White's estate was not present at trial.
State Farm sought declaratory judgment against White's estate, Hege, and Hess.
The jury found that White did not have implied permission to use Gracey's vehicle on July 10, 2012.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readThird Circuit Predicts Pa. High Court's Application of 'Gallagher' and 'Donovan' in 'Mid-Century Insurance v. Werley'
12 minute read$8M Settlement Reached in Wrongful Death, Negligence Suits Against Phila. Foster Agency
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250