Houston Harbaugh to Acquire Litigation Boutique
The midsize business law firm is adding to its litigation offerings, acquiring Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton.
November 10, 2017 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
Two Pittsburgh law firms are preparing to become one, as Houston Harbaugh bolts on business litigation boutique Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, with an eye on diversifying their litigation offerings.
Houston Harbaugh and Picadio Sneath plan to merge effective Jan. 1, they announced Friday, creating a 43-lawyer firm. The combined law firm will keep the name Houston Harbaugh, and will operate out of Houston Harbaugh's existing office at Three Gateway Center in downtown Pittsburgh.
Houston Harbaugh partner and executive committee member Alex Thomson said the two firms were in talks for about 18 months before announcing the combination. They had some mutual clients and referred work to each other, and several partners at the two firms were personal friends, he said.
“We have been always on the lookout for either good laterals or good smaller-size firms,” Thomson said. “We don't have a desire to be an office of a larger firm, so in order to remain independent we need to make sure we're capable of selectively growing.”
Houston Harbaugh works with privately owned companies with between $5 million and $200 million in annual revenue, he said.
“This merger represents growth through the addition of important new practice areas, while giving the entire firm deeper bench strength with an extremely talented group of attorneys who are a great fit for our firm and our clients,” said Samuel Simon, a member of Houston Harbaugh's executive committee, in a statement. “Clients of both firms will see the benefits in terms of the value we deliver and the expanded resources we offer.”
Leadership from Picadio Sneath will take on management roles in Houston Harbaugh's litigation practice. Henry Sneath will now co-chair the litigation practice along with Simon. And Alan Miller, who was president of Picadio Sneath, will chair the insurance coverage and bad-faith practice group, as well as the environmental and energy law practice.
“We've been a litigation boutique for a number of years and that has served us well but we felt it was time to join up with a firm that had a litigation practice where we felt the two practices could really be accretive,” Sneath said. “It brings a whole new world of possibilities for us to reach out to their clients and better service their clients as well.”
Houston Harbaugh, a 40-year-old firm, has traditionally focused on business law, with its core practices as business, trusts and estates, health care and litigation. With its newest acquisition, it adds litigation capabilities in class actions, construction, energy and environmental law, financial services, insurance, intellectual property, life sciences and pharmaceuticals and products liability, the firm said.
“We've always viewed ourselves as a little bit of a unique animal in Pittsburgh in that we have a very strong business practice for a midsize firm,” Thomson said. “We have a very strong group of attorneys who can do quality legal representation at a price point that is very hard for our competitors to meet.”
That is still the case with this addition, he noted, but now the firm's litigation practice has doubled, with the addition of nine lawyers from Picadio Sneath.
Picadio Sneath was founded in Pittsburgh in 1985 as Sherman & Picadio, when Anthony Picadio, Lynette Norton and C. Leon Sherman left Pittsburgh-based Tucker Arensberg to start their own shop. The firm has gone through some changes in its name since then, first when Sherman left and other partners joined, but Picadio remains at the firm as a shareholder focusing on business litigation and environmental law.
One of the firm's former shareholders, Bridget Gillespie, was tapped to head up the Pennsylvania Bar Association's new office in Pittsburgh when it opened last year, as director of western Pennsylvania services.
From the original group that left Tucker Arensberg, only Picadio remained at Picadio Sneath, Sneath said.
“The impetus here is that we did want to be bigger and we did want to have a larger litigation footprint,” he said. “We think it will be easier to recruit top level legal talent at a larger firm.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250