PAP Honors Local Paralegal as Part of Pro Bono Celebration
The American Bar Association (ABA) 9TH Annual National Celebration of Pro Bono was held from Oct. 22, through Oct. 28. The National Celebration of Pro Bono highlights the increasing need for pro bono services and access to justice.
November 15, 2017 at 01:58 PM
4 minute read
The American Bar Association (ABA) 9th Annual National Celebration of Pro Bono was held from Oct. 22 through Oct. 28. The National Celebration of Pro Bono highlights the increasing need for pro bono services and access to justice. Although national in breadth, this initiative provides an opportunity for legal organizations across the country to collaboratively commemorate the vitally important contributions of America's lawyers and to recruit and train the many additional volunteers required to meet the growing demand. This initiative provides a format for showcasing the incredible difference that pro bono lawyers make to our nation, to our system of justice, to our communities and, most of all, to the clients they serve. The Celebration of Pro Bono continues to support, encourage and embrace the role of paralegals in assisting in the pro bono and community events on both a local and national level.
The ongoing need for access to justice is great. The National Federation of Paralegal Associations (NFPA) Model Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibility states that paralegals should aspire to contribute 24 hours of pro bono and community service annually. Whether a student or seasoned paralegal, there is certainly a need and role for every paralegal in the pro bono arena. Many pro bono groups and organizations offer extensive training, reference materials and mentoring to aid volunteers in gaining an understanding of eligibility requirements as well as navigating assignments and completion of pro bono tasks. A paralegal must be mindful of the ongoing role of ethics in the pro bono field. All pro bono tasks must be performed under the guidance and supervision of an attorney in direct correlation with the policies and procedures of the pro bono agency, group or organization. Paralegals must have a deep understanding of issues related to the unauthorized practice of law in pro bono.
The contributions of paralegals in assisting in pro bono under the direct supervision of an attorney work hand-in-hand in allowing those who are unable to pay for legal assistance to obtain representation. At the same time, these instances provide paralegals with personal satisfaction, networking opportunities as well as the ability to enhance professional development.
The Philadelphia Association of Paralegals (PAP) was again honored to highlight the ongoing paralegal pro bono and community service work performed by our members at our fourth quarter luncheon held on Oct. 24, at the Sofitel Hotel in connection with the Celebration of Pro Bono. At the luncheon, PAP partnered with the Support Center for Child Advocates (SCCA) on their new Young Friends of Child Advocates Project. PAP members donated personal care items for male and female clients to support SCCA in their mission to reach new generations and the ever-growing needs of the agency. PAP was also pleased to present the 2017 Pro Bono Award to Frank Innes Jr., CRP. This award was generously sponsored by The Reliable Companies. Innes is a paralegal with the Elder Care Law Center of Philadelphia. Innes has also worked on “tangled titles” for Philadelphia VIP over the past year. As part of the Celebration of Pro Bono and in its ongoing commitment to pro bono, PAP donated $1,000 to Philadelphia VIP on behalf of Frank Innes. Annie Mrazik of Philadelphia VIP attended the luncheon and graciously accepted the donation.
PAP continues its ongoing commitment to pro bono and community service through a variety of local groups and organizations. If you are seeking paralegal pro bono opportunities or would like additional information on upcoming community service events, contact The Philadelphia Associations of Paralegals at [email protected].
Christine M. Flynn is a litigation paralegal with Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith with 29 years of experience in the field. She is a past president of The Philadelphia Association of Paralegals (PAP). She is currently a board member and acts as the 2017 chair of pro bono, litigation, programs and professional development committees.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCFPB Advisory Opinion Targets Illegal Medical Debt Collection Tactics
8 minute readNJDEP Proposes Changes to Hazardous Substance Discharge Reporting Rules
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa 100: Largest Law Firms
- 2Whistleblowers Are Here To Stay: Counseling Corporate Clients on Whistleblower Programs
- 3Intentionally Caused Motor Vehicle Accidents In the Video Spotlight
- 4Scrap the State's Taxpayer Funding of Elections
- 52025 Starting Line-Up: Meet Georgia's Newest Magistrate Court Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250