Meek Mill's Reported New Bail Hearing Isn't Happening
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually…
November 17, 2017 at 04:46 PM
3 minute read
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually harsh sentence appeared on Friday to grant the rapper a new bail hearing. Only it turns out she never did.
According to a spokesman for the court, an entry on the docket for the rapper, whose real name is Robert Williams, setting a bail hearing for Nov. 27 was a clerical error.
The announcement, however, came after numerous publications picked up on the docket entry and reported that Williams was expected to be in court before Judge Genece Brinkley at 9 .m. the Monday after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Williams' case has garnered significant media attention after Brinkley last week sentenced the hip-hop star to two to four years of incarceration after violating his probation. Williams, who has been on probation since 2008, was arrested twice this year.
The sentence came as a surprise because neither the prosecutor, nor Williams' probation officer, had asked for prison time. However, the bigger surprise came the next day, when New York attorney Joe Tacopina, one of the rapper's lawyers, made statements to the press that Brinkley had imposed the harsh sentence because she was “enamored” with Williams and had acted inappropriately in handling the case.
Those allegations were made part of the official record earlier this week in a motion asking Brinkley to recuse. However, numerous Philadelphia-area attorneys recently told The Legal they thought the brash tactics of Williams' legal team might do more harm than good to his case.
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually harsh sentence appeared on Friday to grant the rapper a new bail hearing. Only it turns out she never did.
According to a spokesman for the court, an entry on the docket for the rapper, whose real name is Robert Williams, setting a bail hearing for Nov. 27 was a clerical error.
The announcement, however, came after numerous publications picked up on the docket entry and reported that Williams was expected to be in court before Judge Genece Brinkley at 9 .m. the Monday after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Williams' case has garnered significant media attention after Brinkley last week sentenced the hip-hop star to two to four years of incarceration after violating his probation. Williams, who has been on probation since 2008, was arrested twice this year.
The sentence came as a surprise because neither the prosecutor, nor Williams' probation officer, had asked for prison time. However, the bigger surprise came the next day, when
Those allegations were made part of the official record earlier this week in a motion asking Brinkley to recuse. However, numerous Philadelphia-area attorneys recently told The Legal they thought the brash tactics of Williams' legal team might do more harm than good to his case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readSuspected Shooter of UnitedHealthcare CEO Is Charged With Murder in New York. Now What?
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-87
- 2The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 3Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 4Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 5Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250