Meek Mill's Reported New Bail Hearing Isn't Happening
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually…
November 17, 2017 at 04:46 PM
3 minute read
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually harsh sentence appeared on Friday to grant the rapper a new bail hearing. Only it turns out she never did.
According to a spokesman for the court, an entry on the docket for the rapper, whose real name is Robert Williams, setting a bail hearing for Nov. 27 was a clerical error.
The announcement, however, came after numerous publications picked up on the docket entry and reported that Williams was expected to be in court before Judge Genece Brinkley at 9 .m. the Monday after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Williams' case has garnered significant media attention after Brinkley last week sentenced the hip-hop star to two to four years of incarceration after violating his probation. Williams, who has been on probation since 2008, was arrested twice this year.
The sentence came as a surprise because neither the prosecutor, nor Williams' probation officer, had asked for prison time. However, the bigger surprise came the next day, when New York attorney Joe Tacopina, one of the rapper's lawyers, made statements to the press that Brinkley had imposed the harsh sentence because she was “enamored” with Williams and had acted inappropriately in handling the case.
Those allegations were made part of the official record earlier this week in a motion asking Brinkley to recuse. However, numerous Philadelphia-area attorneys recently told The Legal they thought the brash tactics of Williams' legal team might do more harm than good to his case.
In the midst of a growing controversy over the prison sentence rapper Meek Mill received for violating probation, the judge who handed down the unusually harsh sentence appeared on Friday to grant the rapper a new bail hearing. Only it turns out she never did.
According to a spokesman for the court, an entry on the docket for the rapper, whose real name is Robert Williams, setting a bail hearing for Nov. 27 was a clerical error.
The announcement, however, came after numerous publications picked up on the docket entry and reported that Williams was expected to be in court before Judge Genece Brinkley at 9 .m. the Monday after the Thanksgiving holiday.
Williams' case has garnered significant media attention after Brinkley last week sentenced the hip-hop star to two to four years of incarceration after violating his probation. Williams, who has been on probation since 2008, was arrested twice this year.
The sentence came as a surprise because neither the prosecutor, nor Williams' probation officer, had asked for prison time. However, the bigger surprise came the next day, when
Those allegations were made part of the official record earlier this week in a motion asking Brinkley to recuse. However, numerous Philadelphia-area attorneys recently told The Legal they thought the brash tactics of Williams' legal team might do more harm than good to his case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readSuspected Shooter of UnitedHealthcare CEO Is Charged With Murder in New York. Now What?
Trending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250