After More Than a Century, No More Marbury at DLA Piper
Hugh Marbury has joined Cozen O'Connor, leaving a firm that can trace its history back to his great-grandfather.
November 20, 2017 at 05:50 PM
44 minute read
Hugh Marbury
After more than two decades at DLA Piper, and despite a multigeneration family connection to one of DLA Piper's predecessor firms, intellectual property litigator Hugh Marbury is making the move to Cozen O'Connor, where he will help lead the IP practice in Washington, D.C.
Marbury will be a lead trial lawyer, heading up IP and commercial litigation matters in Washington, Cozen O'Connor announced.
Marbury's connection to DLA Piper goes back further than his own career, and includes a number of mergers and name changes. His great-grandfather, who graduated from law school in the 1880s, founded his own firm, which Marbury's grandfather, William Marbury Jr., joined in the early 1900s. In the 1950s, William Marbury Jr. merged Marbury, Miller & Evans with Piper, Watkins, Avirett & Egerton, forming Baltimore's Piper & Marbury.
Piper & Marbury merged with Chicago-based Rudnick & Wolfe in 1999, creating Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, which later shortened its name to Piper Rudnick. Piper Rudnick merged with DLA LLP in 2005.
“That firm has changed and grown in a direction that doesn't match what my clients are asking me for,” Marbury said this week, specifically pointing to flexibility in staffing and rates. His clients range from startups to large, publicly traded companies.
Marbury said he was connected with Cozen O'Connor through a recruiter, and was interested in the firm's focus on IP, as well as the Washington, Delaware and New York markets, where he focuses most of his time.
Earlier this year, Cozen O'Connor hired two patent litigators from Norton Rose Fulbright, adding to its Minneapolis office. The firm also acquired Miami-based IP boutique Feldman Gale in 2016.
After the Norton Rose hires, Cozen O'Connor IP co-chair Kerry McTigue noted that strengthening IP was especially important after the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands. Marbury said his experience in Delaware is especially valuable following that decision, as it makes Delaware the busiest jurisdiction for patent cases.
“Hugh is an ideal fit because he combines business acumen with a thorough understanding of the ever-shifting legal and technological IP landscape,” said Barry Boss, Cozen O'Connor's Washington office managing partner and commercial litigation department vice chair, in a statement. “Hugh has a proven track record of successfully leading many complex IP matters, and he's an active participant in the IP bar, so he's aware of legal developments as soon as they happen.”
According to Cozen O'Connor, Marbury has represented clients in cases with a combined $4 billion at stake.
“I was lucky as a young lawyer to get involved in some very large disputes as an early age,” he said. “That's 20-plus years of trials and arbitrations ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars” in value.
Marbury's practice focuses on patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret litigation in various industries, including IP-related disputes that arise after merger closings.
IP is one of several practice areas Cozen O'Connor has focused on growing this year, with an eye on increasing head count to as many as 1,000 lawyers. Other practices of interest to the firm have been institutional response to sexual misconduct, a new group this year, and labor and employment.
DLA Piper did not respond to a request for comment on Marbury's departure.
Hugh Marbury
After more than two decades at
Marbury will be a lead trial lawyer, heading up IP and commercial litigation matters in Washington,
Marbury's connection to
“That firm has changed and grown in a direction that doesn't match what my clients are asking me for,” Marbury said this week, specifically pointing to flexibility in staffing and rates. His clients range from startups to large, publicly traded companies.
Marbury said he was connected with
Earlier this year,
After the
“Hugh is an ideal fit because he combines business acumen with a thorough understanding of the ever-shifting legal and technological IP landscape,” said Barry Boss,
According to
“I was lucky as a young lawyer to get involved in some very large disputes as an early age,” he said. “That's 20-plus years of trials and arbitrations ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars” in value.
Marbury's practice focuses on patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret litigation in various industries, including IP-related disputes that arise after merger closings.
IP is one of several practice areas
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250