Trucker Argued Plaintiff Turned Too Quickly, Caused Sideswipe
On Oct. 14, 2015, plaintiff Franchesca Rodriguez Dejesus, 25, a custodian, was driving a sedan on Interstate 76 in Philadelphia. Her father was a front-seat passenger. To her left, in the middle lane, was a tractor-trailer, which sideswiped her on the driver's side. She claimed injuries to her neck and left shoulder.
December 14, 2017 at 07:20 PM
8 minute read
Dejesus v. Fowlds Brothers Trucking
Date of Verdict:
Oct. 17.
Court and Case No.:
C.P. Montgomery 2016-09541.
Judge:
Steven C. Tolliver.
Type of Action:
Motor vehicle.
Injuries:
Neck and back pain.
Plaintiffs Counsel:
John L. Aris, Lowenthal & Abrams, Bala Cynwyd.
Defense Counsel:
Sonia Di Valerio, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert:
Robert Ranelle, orthopedic surgery, Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
Defense Expert:
Andrew Collier, orthopedic surgery, Philadelphia; Steven Edell, radiology, Wilmington, Delaware.
Comment:
On Oct. 14, 2015, plaintiff Franchesca Rodriguez Dejesus, 25, a custodian, was driving a sedan on Interstate 76 in Philadelphia. Her father was a front-seat passenger.
Intending to merge onto U.S. Route 1, toward her right, Dejesus was in the right lane of the highway. To her left, in the middle lane, was a tractor-trailer, which sideswiped her on the driver's side. She claimed injuries to her neck and left shoulder.
Dejesus sued the tractor-trailer driver, Lauri Hackett, and her employer, Dakotaland Transportation Inc., alleging negligence in the operation of a vehicle.
Fowlds Brothers Trucking Inc. was improperly named as a defendant and was dismissed.
During court-mandated arbitration, Dejesus was determined to receive $65,000, which Hackett and Dakotaland Transportation rejected.
At trial, Dejesus asserted that she had stopped her car before making the right turn when the tractor-trailer, which was also turning, entered her lane and sideswiped the driver's side of her sedan.
Hackett and her employer maintained that Dejesus was not stopped as she alleged, and it was she who caused the accident. Counsel noted that Dejesus had testified that she was late for work at the time of the accident and counsel argued that she was likely speeding to get to work, took the right turn too quickly, and entered Hackett's lane of travel, striking the tractor-trailer.
Four days after the accident, Dejesus, complaining of neck pain, presented to an emergency room, where she was examined and released.
On Oct. 21, Dejesus, complaining of neck and low-back pain, presented to a chiropractor, with whom she treated for four-and-a-half months. She was diagnosed with strains and sprains of her cervical and lumbar spine. Treatment included massage and spinal manipulation. Her back complaints resolved during treatment.
Following treatment, Dejesus continued to experience neck pain and radicular pain into her left (non-dominant) shoulder. She began treating with an orthopedic surgeon and a pain-management specialist, who administered a painkilling injection to her cervical spine.
After MRIs and EMGs, Dejesus was diagnosed with bulging at cervical intervertebral discs C5-6 and C6-7, left-sided radiculopathy stemming from C6-7, and tendinitis in the left shoulder.
Dejesus' orthopedic surgeon causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident, and opined that her bulging and radiculopathy were permanent.
Dejesus testified that her continued neck and shoulder pain affect her ability to interact with her children, whom she has trouble lifting. She also has difficulty performing household tasks, such as laundry and grocery shopping, and engaging in social activities, such as dancing. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Hackett's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Dejesus, testified that she had cervical strain and sprain and left-shoulder tendinitis from the accident, and that she continued to have restricted cervical and shoulder range of motion, and restricted use of her left arm.
Hackett's expert in radiology opined that her MRI and EMG showed pre-existing chronic issues, and nothing traumatic in nature.
The jury rendered a defense verdict.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication •
Dejesus v. Fowlds Brothers Trucking
Date of Verdict:
Oct. 17.
Court and Case No.:
C.P. Montgomery 2016-09541.
Judge:
Steven C. Tolliver.
Type of Action:
Motor vehicle.
Injuries:
Neck and back pain.
Plaintiffs Counsel:
John L. Aris, Lowenthal & Abrams, Bala Cynwyd.
Defense Counsel:
Sonia Di Valerio,
Plaintiffs Expert:
Robert Ranelle, orthopedic surgery, Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
Defense Expert:
Andrew Collier, orthopedic surgery, Philadelphia; Steven Edell, radiology, Wilmington, Delaware.
Comment:
On Oct. 14, 2015, plaintiff Franchesca Rodriguez Dejesus, 25, a custodian, was driving a sedan on Interstate 76 in Philadelphia. Her father was a front-seat passenger.
Intending to merge onto U.S. Route 1, toward her right, Dejesus was in the right lane of the highway. To her left, in the middle lane, was a tractor-trailer, which sideswiped her on the driver's side. She claimed injuries to her neck and left shoulder.
Dejesus sued the tractor-trailer driver, Lauri Hackett, and her employer, Dakotaland Transportation Inc., alleging negligence in the operation of a vehicle.
Fowlds Brothers Trucking Inc. was improperly named as a defendant and was dismissed.
During court-mandated arbitration, Dejesus was determined to receive $65,000, which Hackett and Dakotaland Transportation rejected.
At trial, Dejesus asserted that she had stopped her car before making the right turn when the tractor-trailer, which was also turning, entered her lane and sideswiped the driver's side of her sedan.
Hackett and her employer maintained that Dejesus was not stopped as she alleged, and it was she who caused the accident. Counsel noted that Dejesus had testified that she was late for work at the time of the accident and counsel argued that she was likely speeding to get to work, took the right turn too quickly, and entered Hackett's lane of travel, striking the tractor-trailer.
Four days after the accident, Dejesus, complaining of neck pain, presented to an emergency room, where she was examined and released.
On Oct. 21, Dejesus, complaining of neck and low-back pain, presented to a chiropractor, with whom she treated for four-and-a-half months. She was diagnosed with strains and sprains of her cervical and lumbar spine. Treatment included massage and spinal manipulation. Her back complaints resolved during treatment.
Following treatment, Dejesus continued to experience neck pain and radicular pain into her left (non-dominant) shoulder. She began treating with an orthopedic surgeon and a pain-management specialist, who administered a painkilling injection to her cervical spine.
After MRIs and EMGs, Dejesus was diagnosed with bulging at cervical intervertebral discs C5-6 and C6-7, left-sided radiculopathy stemming from C6-7, and tendinitis in the left shoulder.
Dejesus' orthopedic surgeon causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident, and opined that her bulging and radiculopathy were permanent.
Dejesus testified that her continued neck and shoulder pain affect her ability to interact with her children, whom she has trouble lifting. She also has difficulty performing household tasks, such as laundry and grocery shopping, and engaging in social activities, such as dancing. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Hackett's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Dejesus, testified that she had cervical strain and sprain and left-shoulder tendinitis from the accident, and that she continued to have restricted cervical and shoulder range of motion, and restricted use of her left arm.
Hackett's expert in radiology opined that her MRI and EMG showed pre-existing chronic issues, and nothing traumatic in nature.
The jury rendered a defense verdict.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication •
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readWhile Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can Be Prevented
4 minute readThe Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 2Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 3Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
- 42 Carter Arnett Litigators to Join Baker & Hostetler in Dallas
- 5People in the News—Nov. 27, 2024—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250