Q&A: Small-Town Firms Combine for Smoother Client Transitions
Two western Pennsylvania firms saw a merger as the key to their succession planning.
December 18, 2017 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The largest law firm in Venango County is about to get a little bigger.
Dale Woodard Gent, a four-lawyer firm in Franklin, recently announced a merger with Seneca-based McFate & Merkel. The combination is scheduled to take effect at the beginning of next year, and the new six-lawyer firm will be called Dale Woodard Gent McFate.
The larger firm was born out of another merger, in 2011, when Dale Woodard Law Firm and Gent, Gent & Snyder combined. But its roots go back to the 1930s, when Bob Dale and Ray Woodard started their practice.
Partner James Greenfield said the latest combination, like many small firm mergers, was largely motivated by succession planning. Greenfield spoke with The Legal about merging and integrating two law firms in a small legal market. His responses were edited lightly for length.
How did your firm get connected with McFate & Merkel?
We've known Bob McFate for a long time. He's been practicing for 40-some years, so we've known him. Greg [Merkel] is Bob's son-in-law, and he's been practicing in this county I think for five years with Bob.
Why did you make the decision to combine? What was in it for each of you?
We think very highly of both of [McFate and Merkel], of their legal abilities, and we seem to have the same approach to practicing law. Bob is 70 years old and approaching retirement. We saw it as an opportunity to add two quality attorneys. And one of our attorneys retired at the beginning of this year, so we saw this as an opportunity to get up to full strength.
What do you have to do to integrate the two practices?
There's just a lot of technical things to do. New computers, new office space, deciding which furniture to move and which to get rid of, integrating staff, integrating 401(k) plans, getting Westlaw subscriptions. Adding the two lawyers' practices is pretty easy, but it's the administrative details that are the difficult part.
How much staff does the combined firm have?
We will have, when they're here, nine. We have two state administration paralegals, one real estate paralegal, our office manager and the rest are secretarial.
What practices do you now offer all together?
In a rural area it's a general practice to some extent. We have one partner who practices almost exclusively on domestic transactions, two of us who do state administration, real estate, estate planning and business transactions, a fourth partner who does domestic transactions and a fair amount of litigation. McFate and Merkel would primarily be doing transactional work as well, but Greg also wants to do more litigation.
We often hear that small firms need to be especially forward-thinking about succession planning. What is your advice?
The most important thing is to find some people that are compatible with the way you practice law, what you're approach is and, frankly, what your ethics are. If you can find the right people , then it's kind of what we do every day planning for clients for succession.
Do you have any plans to add lawyers?
Bob McFate is 70, and two of our attorneys now are in their mid- to late-60s, so we're looking at them transitioning into retirement. There may be some replacement additions then, but the firm won't look to grow larger than six lawyers.
What are your thoughts on carrying on these law firms and their history?
It's surprising how many people remember the people who started the firms. At one time back in the day, every time we added a new partner we changed the name of the firm. More recently we decided it made more sense to be a little more like the big-city firms that have a name that doesn't change much. The name becomes unwieldy if you have six partners' names in the name of the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1M&A Transactions and AB 1824: Navigating New Privacy Compliance Challenges
- 2Devin Nunes, Former California GOP Congressman, Loses Move to Revive Defamation Suit
- 3Judge Sides With Retail Display Company in Patent Dispute Against Campbell Soup, Grocery Stores
- 4Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 5Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250