Q&A: Small-Town Firms Combine for Smoother Client Transitions
Two western Pennsylvania firms saw a merger as the key to their succession planning.
December 18, 2017 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The largest law firm in Venango County is about to get a little bigger.
Dale Woodard Gent, a four-lawyer firm in Franklin, recently announced a merger with Seneca-based McFate & Merkel. The combination is scheduled to take effect at the beginning of next year, and the new six-lawyer firm will be called Dale Woodard Gent McFate.
The larger firm was born out of another merger, in 2011, when Dale Woodard Law Firm and Gent, Gent & Snyder combined. But its roots go back to the 1930s, when Bob Dale and Ray Woodard started their practice.
Partner James Greenfield said the latest combination, like many small firm mergers, was largely motivated by succession planning. Greenfield spoke with The Legal about merging and integrating two law firms in a small legal market. His responses were edited lightly for length.
How did your firm get connected with McFate & Merkel?
We've known Bob McFate for a long time. He's been practicing for 40-some years, so we've known him. Greg [Merkel] is Bob's son-in-law, and he's been practicing in this county I think for five years with Bob.
Why did you make the decision to combine? What was in it for each of you?
We think very highly of both of [McFate and Merkel], of their legal abilities, and we seem to have the same approach to practicing law. Bob is 70 years old and approaching retirement. We saw it as an opportunity to add two quality attorneys. And one of our attorneys retired at the beginning of this year, so we saw this as an opportunity to get up to full strength.
What do you have to do to integrate the two practices?
There's just a lot of technical things to do. New computers, new office space, deciding which furniture to move and which to get rid of, integrating staff, integrating 401(k) plans, getting Westlaw subscriptions. Adding the two lawyers' practices is pretty easy, but it's the administrative details that are the difficult part.
How much staff does the combined firm have?
We will have, when they're here, nine. We have two state administration paralegals, one real estate paralegal, our office manager and the rest are secretarial.
What practices do you now offer all together?
In a rural area it's a general practice to some extent. We have one partner who practices almost exclusively on domestic transactions, two of us who do state administration, real estate, estate planning and business transactions, a fourth partner who does domestic transactions and a fair amount of litigation. McFate and Merkel would primarily be doing transactional work as well, but Greg also wants to do more litigation.
We often hear that small firms need to be especially forward-thinking about succession planning. What is your advice?
The most important thing is to find some people that are compatible with the way you practice law, what you're approach is and, frankly, what your ethics are. If you can find the right people , then it's kind of what we do every day planning for clients for succession.
Do you have any plans to add lawyers?
Bob McFate is 70, and two of our attorneys now are in their mid- to late-60s, so we're looking at them transitioning into retirement. There may be some replacement additions then, but the firm won't look to grow larger than six lawyers.
What are your thoughts on carrying on these law firms and their history?
It's surprising how many people remember the people who started the firms. At one time back in the day, every time we added a new partner we changed the name of the firm. More recently we decided it made more sense to be a little more like the big-city firms that have a name that doesn't change much. The name becomes unwieldy if you have six partners' names in the name of the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250