Pittsburgh AI Startup Promises to Boost Law Firm Margins
Pittsburgh-based LegalSifter says its contract reading technology can be "a revenue expander" for outside counsel.
December 20, 2017 at 05:14 PM
4 minute read
Amid the ever-growing buzz about artificial intelligence in the legal industry, a Pittsburgh-based startup recently announced its first “combined intelligence” partnership with a law firm—with more deals likely to follow.
LegalSifter, founded by two Carnegie Mellon University alums who received seed funding from the school in 2014, offers software that reads contracts and then gives advice about them. The person viewing that advice could be an executive, a company lawyer, or even outside counsel, said LegalSifter CEO Kevin Miller.
After a contract is uploaded, Miller said, it takes about 10 to 20 seconds to read the document and decide what elements are present. Then the software highlights key concepts and offers advice on how to approach them. That's where the “combined” part comes in—the advice can be tailored to the user and supplemented with lawyer guidance.
For instance, if the software detects an assignment clause, it will show the client company's typical stance on assignment clauses. When the tool is in its non-customized state, LegalSifter provides some best-practices text so users aren't starting from scratch, Miller said, but that can be changed to reflect a particular lawyer's advice or a client's policy.
The software lowers risk for companies that use it, Miller said. “Lots and lots of nonlawyers are negotiating contracts because they can't afford to wait for outside counsel” during a negotiation, he said.
And for law firms, LegalSifter says it offers an opportunity to widen profit margins, particularly when working on a fixed-fee or alternative-fee basis.
“A lawyer that uses this product is faster, materially so, and makes fewer mistakes,” Miller said. “It's a revenue expander and it's a margin expander, and it also allows the law firm to get stickier with the client because they're selling subscriptions” to the software.
He added that LegalSifter also creates a way for senior attorneys to provide junior lawyers with guidance as they evaluate contracts from afar, by loading the software with their own best practices for others in their firm to consult.
Earlier this month, LegalSifter announced a partnership with U.K. law firm TLT LLP. And at the beginning of 2018, the company expects to officially announce a similar partnership with Horty Springer & Mattern, a boutique firm based in Pittsburgh. Several other law firms have signed seller agreements that will become public next year as well, Miller said.
Dan Mulholland, a senior partner at Horty Springer, said his firm learned about LegalSifter early in 2017, somewhat by accident. Mulholland said he was looking for an e-discovery vendor when he came across the startup, but he was intrigued by the idea.
Horty Springer, a 16-lawyer firm, provides full-service legal counsel to health systems and hospitals, so much of their practice involves contract review.
“We found it a very useful tool that we could review a contract, redline it and in a matter of minutes send it back to the client,” Mulholland said. “Whatever time we're devoting into it now will be recouped many-fold because of the efficiencies it gives us.”
Mulholland said his firm plans to let clients use the software on their own, customize it based on their business, or use the software with simultaneous added guidance from a lawyer. He noted that his firm has been using fixed-fee arrangements for more than 30 years, and the software will be all the more useful in that respect.
“A lot of people think this artificial intelligence development is going to eliminate lawyers, I think it's going to create a lot of opportunities for law firms,” Mulholland said. “This gives us a very efficient way to service clients on a fixed fee.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute readWho Got the Work: Morgan Lewis Set to Defend X Corp., Elon Musk in ERISA Suit
Federal Judge Sides With Lyft Driver in Contractual Dispute Over $1M Uninsured Motorist Coverage
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250