Amazon Can't Be Liable for Third-Party Vendors' Products, Court Says
The online retail giant Amazon cannot be held liable for a defective dog leash that partially blinded a woman, a federal court in Pennsylvania has ruled, wading into an unanswered question in Pennsylvania products liability law.
December 22, 2017 at 01:31 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Ken Wolter/Shutterstock.com
The online retail giant Amazon cannot be held liable for a defective dog leash that partially blinded a woman, a federal court in Pennsylvania has ruled, wading into an unanswered question in Pennsylvania products liability law.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann of the Middle District of Pennsylvania on Thursday predicted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would not consider the online behemoth a “seller” for the purposes of products liability, and granted Amazon's summary judgment motion in Oberdorf v. Amazon.com.
In determining that strict liability should not be applied to Amazon, Brann likened the website to a newspaper, or auction house, which is not expected to vet products in the same way a brick-and-mortar store would.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250