Berger & Montague Names First Chairwoman, Savett
Sherrie Savett has led multiple practices at the firm for years, and is now its first chairwoman.
January 03, 2018 at 05:29 PM
4 minute read
Sherrie Savett.
Philadelphia-based class action firm Berger & Montague has named its first chairwoman in its 48-year existence, as Sherrie Savett takes over the role from Merrill Davidoff.
Savett, who leads the legal team representing Philadelphia in a high-profile lending bias case against Wells Fargo, officially assumed the leadership position Jan. 1, the firm said in an announcement Wednesday.
Davidoff was named chairman just over one year ago. He will continue as a managing shareholder and co-chair of the firm's antitrust, commodities and financial instruments, environment and public health and securities and investor protection practices. Before Davidoff, name partner and firm co-founder H. Laddie Montague Jr. served as chairman from 2002 to 2016.
Savett said Davidoff only intended to serve as chairman for one year when he took the position. She declined to comment on whether she had a particular term length in mind for herself.
“The plan was for one year, and he did an excellent job,” she said. “The fact that the term was one year was no reflection on his leadership.”
Savett started at Berger & Montague in 1975 and is a longtime member of the firm's executive committee, as well as co-chair of its commercial litigation, securities and investor protection, data breach and False Claims Act practice groups. She said she will remain active in those practice areas, and that she co-leads each of those groups with at least one other lawyer, so they will not lack leadership resources as she adds to her plate.
Savett met firm founder David Berger when she was in law school at the University of Pennsylvania, and she joined his firm as a young lawyer five years later. Savett said Berger was a mentor and role model to her.
“I personally take a huge interest in mentoring younger lawyers,” she said. “It can be overwhelming to have a family and an active law practice. … I always try to encourage all the young lawyers, but especially the women, that it all can be done with the right time management.”
Berger & Montague's lawyer ranks are 30 percent women, and its partnership is 34 percent female. Also Wednesday, the firm announced that it has named two women lawyers to its partnership—Ellen Noteware, who focuses on antitrust class actions, and Caitlin Coslett, who works on complex litigation including antitrust, environmental and mass tort matters.
Savett said the number of women in leadership roles at Berger & Montague is only going to increase as time goes on. She experienced a supportive law firm environment as she came up in her career, she said, including her mentorship from Berger.
Still, things have changed since her early days. When her children were born in the late 1970s and early 1980s, there were no maternal leave policies in place, and she was back to work after eight weeks. Now Berger & Montague offers four months of paid pregnancy leave and alternate schedules for parents of young children.
“I would say our firm is gender blind in the sense of promoting people, compensating people and encouraging achievement,” she said. And “we are quite liberal and not petty about time schedules.”
For the first 20 years of her practice, Savett focused mainly on securities litigation, and through that work she became involved in False Claims Act cases. Throughout her career, Savett has achieved a number of high-dollar settlements and awards. They include settlements of more than $300 million in a case against Rite Aid over accounting problems that caused its stock price to plummet, and a $220 million settlement in a shareholders' suit against Waste Management Inc.
Locally, she recently took on a lending discrimination case against Wells Fargo, representing the city of Philadelphia, which alleges that the bank violated the Fair Housing Act by targeting minority borrowers with high-risk loans. She and colleague Sarah Schalman-Bergen were involved in the U.S. Supreme Court case Wells Fargo v. City of Miami, in which the court determined that municipalities have standing to sue in such cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1On the Move and After Hours: Goldberg Segalla, Faegre Drinker, Pashman Stein
- 2Recent FTC Cases Against Auto Dealers Suggest Regulators Are Keeping Foot on Accelerator
- 3‘Not A Kindergarten Teacher’: Judge Blasts Keller Postman, Jenner & Block, in Mass Arb Dispute
- 4A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 5Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250