Phila. Engages Private Firms to Take on Pharma Over Opioid Crisis
The opioid epidemic has come at a high cost to the Philadelphia region and city officials have sued several leading pharmaceutical companies in an effort to hold them accountable for their alleged role in the crisis.
January 17, 2018 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock.com
The opioid epidemic has come at a high cost to the Philadelphia region and city officials have sued several leading pharmaceutical companies in an effort to hold them accountable for their alleged role in the crisis.
The city of Philadelphia on Wednesday filed suit against five major drug companies, including Johnson & Johnson and Allergan, alleging that the companies used deceptive marketing tactics to increase sales of opioids, and failed to properly warn about the risks for addiction.
The suit, which was filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, asks that the drug companies be made to pay for detoxification treatment of residents suffering from opioid addiction attributable to prescription drugs, and seeks recovery of the money it has spent on municipal services to combating the opioid crisis, including emergency response, health and court services. The lawsuit also seeks an injunction to bar the companies from promoting opioid painkillers as a safe medication.
“This public health crisis harms public safety, order and economic productivity,” City Solicitor Sozi Pedro Tulante said in a statement to the press. “City agencies have incurred large, burdensome, unnecessary and avoidable costs to address the crisis. It is our duty to devote all resources we can to help protect the public from further perils and to finally put an end to the practices which are the root of this epidemic.”
The city Law Department is not acting alone in filing the lawsuit, which city officials stressed is different than the lawsuits several other municipalities have recently filed over the growing opioid crisis. Five Philadelphia law firms are working with the city to pursue the claims. Those firms are Berger & Montague, Dilworth Paxson, Sheller P.C., Sacks Weston Diamond, and Young Ricchiuti Caldwell & Heller. Temple University's Beasley School of Law professor David Kairys is also representing the city in the case.
During a press conference Wednesday, Tulante said the firms are all working on a contingency fee basis, with the fee expected to be about 33 percent of the city's total recovery. He said the firms brought a lot of experience to the case, and that the lawsuit was not the type of litigation the Law Department could handle on its own.
Philadelphia is not the first municipality to sue prescription opioid manufacturers for their alleged role in the growth of opioid addiction around the country. Cities like Chicago and Indianapolis have already done so.
But, according to city officials, this lawsuit is different because it focuses exclusively on the toll the epidemic has taken on Philadelphia, which, according to city Health Commissioner Dr. Thomas Farley, has the highest rate of overdose deaths of any large city in the country. The lawsuit also focuses in part on the city's nuisance laws and its fair practices ordinance.
Tulante said he has been in contact with officials in cities with suits already in progress, but there likely will not be any formal efforts to consolidate with any litigations already in progress.
A spokesman for Purdue Pharma said the company denies the allegations and looks forward to the opportunity to present its defense.
“We are deeply troubled by the prescription and illicit opioid abuse crisis, and are dedicated to being part of the solution,” spokesman John Puskar said. “As a company grounded in science, we must balance patient access to FDA-approved medicines, while working collaboratively to solve this public health challenge.”
The other defendants, Allergan, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals and Cephalon, which was purchased by Teva, did not return requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250