Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Racial Discrimination Lawsuit Against SEPTA
A SEPTA electrician claiming he was passed over for promotion because of his race has struck out in his appeal of the dismissal of his lawsuit.
January 17, 2018 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
A SEPTA electrician claiming he was passed over for promotion because of his race has struck out in his appeal of the dismissal of his lawsuit.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a Philadelphia federal judge's ruling dismissing Jamar Boykins' racial discrimination and retaliation claims against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority.
Boykins, who is black, sued after being denied a management position for which SEPTA said he was the seventh most qualified out of a field of 11 applicants. He applied for another three promotions and was offered an interview for one, but declined to attend, according to Judge Anthony Scirica's opinion. When he was denied interviews for the other two, Boykins amended his discrimination complaint to include retaliation.
Boykins argued that SEPTA's reasons for granting a promotion to a white colleague, James Schneider, over him were “new found” and inconsistent, including claiming that the job was construction-related and that Boykins had no construction experience. Scirica said the issue was raised for the first time on appeal, and thus waived.
“Regardless, a review of the record reveals no inconsistencies, and the value SEPTA placed on Schneider's construction experience can hardly be characterized as 'new found,'” Scirica said. “Where the employer asserts it hired the 'best qualified' candidate, a plaintiff must show 'that the defendant's selection process and criteria were filled with such inconsistencies that the employer's claim that it was seeking the “best qualified” candidate was a sham.' Boykins cannot make such a showing here, primarily because he can point to no actual inconsistencies.”
Boykins also claimed that hiring panel member Gerald McGovern used prejudicial reasons for hiring Schneider.
“If anything, the record contradicts the discriminatory motives Boykins attributes to McGovern. Of the panel members, McGovern gave Boykins the highest ranking he received. McGovern was also the hiring manager for Position #15-071 (which Boykins also applied for) and, in that instance, SEPTA selected an African-American for the promotion,” Scirica said.
Lastly, Boykins argued that SEPTA hasn't hired a black maintenance manager in 20 years in the building and bridges department, where he applied, and stressed that all maintenance managers in his department prior to 2015 were white.
“Here, Boykins does not provide a basis for his statement that no African-Americans have been hired as maintenance managers in 20 years in the building and bridges department,” Scirica said. “Furthermore, while the record supports Boykins' contention that the four maintenance managers reporting to McGovern were Caucasian, the trial judge explained that 'the race of prior persons promoted is meaningless without evidence regarding whether African-American applicants were denied the promotion or the relative qualifications of the applicants.'”
Gaetan Alfano of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti represents SEPTA and declined to comment on the ruling.
Reached Wednesday, Boykins' attorney, Olugbenga O. Abiona of Philadelphia, said, “I want to review it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewly Formed DEI Practices Expect Heightened Demand During Trump Administration
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 2Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
- 3NY District Attorneys Ask for Level Funding Amid Statewide Drop in Violent Crime
- 4Texas Trial Boutique Matches Milbank Bonuses, Paying Up to $140K
- 5'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250