DA Wants 19 Cosby Accusers to Testify at Retrial
As Bill Cosby's retrial on sexual assault charges approaches, Montgomery County prosecutors are seeking to introduce testimony from more women who have accused Cosby of sexual misconduct—18 more than the court allowed at his first trial, to be exact.
January 18, 2018 at 01:23 PM
3 minute read
As Bill Cosby's retrial on sexual assault charges approaches, Montgomery County prosecutors are seeking to introduce testimony from more women who have accused Cosby of sexual misconduct—18 more than the court allowed at his first trial, to be exact.
The Montgomery County District Attorney's Office filed a motion Thursday in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, arguing that although the criminal charges Cosby is facing relate only to allegations by one woman—Andrea Constand—prosecutors should be allowed to present testimony of other women who have accused Cosby of sexually assaulting them. The motion included accounts from 19 women the prosecutors hope to call as witnesses.
At Cosby's first criminal trial, in June, Judge Steven T. O'Neill allowed testimony from just one prior bad acts witness, who alleges that Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted her in 1996. Prosecutors had asked the court to allow 13 prior bad acts witnesses at the first trial.
Cosby's first trial ended in a mistrial, after a jury from Pittsburgh deliberated for five days and was unable to reach a verdict. His retrial is set to begin April 2. He is facing three charges of aggravated indecent assault, based on Constand's allegations that he drugged and sexually assaulted her at his Cheltenham home in 2004.
In their most recent motion, prosecutors argued that the accounts of other women are relevant because they show a common scheme to each alleged assault, and the absence of mistake. In addition, the motion said, the evidence is admissible under the doctrine of chances, also known as the doctrine of objective improbability.
“Under this non-character-based theory of logical relevance, as the number of victims reporting similar drug-induced sexual assaults by defendant increases, so does the objective improbability that defendant mistakenly assessed each victim's level of consciousness when engaging in sexual contact with her,” the district attorney's motion said.
According to the motion, the District Attorney's Office has investigated more than 50 allegations against Cosby of drug-facilitated sexual assault. Dozens of women have made those accusations publicly, and several have filed civil lawsuits against Cosby, some of which are ongoing.
The 19 women the district attorney hopes to call as witnesses, including the six new accusers, have alleged that Cosby assaulted them between 1965 and 1996. The most recent allegations are from the woman who testified at the first trial. Most of the alleged assaults took place in the 1970s and 1980s.
Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele announced the charges against Cosby in December 2015, just before the 12-year statute of limitations on Constand's allegations was set to expire. Constand originally went to law enforcement in 2005, but then-Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor Jr. declined to prosecute Cosby. Constand brought a civil suit against Cosby, which ended in a confidential settlement in 2006.
Constand and Castor are currently embroiled in their own civil litigation. Constand has sued Castor in federal court, alleging he defamed her in his statements about the 2005 investigation. Castor has sued Constand in Philadelphia court, alleging that she only brought the defamation claims to destroy Castor's political career.
Andrew Wyatt, a spokesman for Cosby's legal team, declined to comment on the motion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250