A Tale From the War Room: How One Law Firm Started 2018 Right
I thought I would begin 2018 by telling you about a very industrious and special law firm that will remain—anonymous—who has begun the year in an outstanding way from a marketing perspective. I have the great privilege of working with some of the best lawyers in the state and this firm is at the top of my list—now more than ever.
January 22, 2018 at 01:23 PM
5 minute read
I thought I would begin 2018 by telling you about a very industrious and special law firm that will remain—anonymous—who has begun the year in an outstanding way from a marketing perspective. I have the great privilege of working with some of the best lawyers in the state and this firm is at the top of my list—now more than ever. This is because they have kicked off 2018 by having their lawyers engage in what some feel is the most important client development activity any firm can do—an in-person client interview.
Here is how they organized the effort. In early January, all lawyers in this premier firm met in their main office to learn about the client-interview process—how to do one, what to ask, how to follow up and more.
After the hour or so tutorial, we ran through a list of value added services I had prepared to identify what we could do for clients after or at the interview that would not cost the client anything. We did the same for key referral sources.
Then we headed out of the conference room en masse to what I will call the “war room.” I named our efforts a military strike of sorts because for 15 treasured clients of the firm, we were going to strategically map out how we would enhance the personal and professional lives of these clients in the months to come.
Thankfully, the war room had a huge wall. And so, I began to write on index cards the names of 15 clients and the name of the specific lawyer in the firm who would be in charge of interviewing them. What was key, was that everyone have a role in the process—not just the lawyers with the biggest book of business. Each lawyer in the firm, no matter their age, had to feel invested in this effort and take responsibility for growing the firm's practice this year. The firm's leadership and outstanding administrators made sure at this meeting that that everyone understood that this effort was not just mandatory but very blessed in terms of the time commitment that would be involved.
The index card with the client's name went on the very top of the wall. Soon there were 15 names lined up on the wall. Columns were being created for each client to delineate the activity to be done and deadline date.
The next index card that went under each client's name read in green ink: “Client Interview to be done by Feb. 1.” The third index card in the column then read: Feb. 2- “Get back to client with progress report on what was discussed at the interview.” It is key when a client gives you constructive criticism or suggestions that you jump on these comments and remediate to the best of your ability right away. If you are not willing to do so, the whole effort will be for naught.
The last index card I placed in each column read: “Next step” with a date the week later for all lawyers to reconvene as a group and discuss how the interviews went and what we learned from them. At this same meeting in early February, we will place a fifth index card in each column on the wall to indicate the very specific action item the lawyer will take to provide value to the client. There will be a deadline of Feb. 28 for these next actions.
In early March, we will reconvene to brainstorm on the next “touch” and to learn from one another's efforts. And we will continue to add an index card to each client's column on the wall to indicate what we will do for the following month and the next.
The cards remain up on the wall in the war room and will for months to come. They serve as a visible reminder that we have a specific plan and direction in front of us. There will be few random acts of marketing in 2018 because everyone is being held accountable at these monthly meetings to do what they said they would do and share their experience as to what worked and what did not. And we will not stop meeting till the end of year. Research will be a key component of this effort—to help each lawyer understand as much about the client's world as possible. Press releases on the client's website, internet searches, Google alerts and more will be employed to stay on top of the client's business, goals and aspirations.
It's your turn to create your own military strategy and war room. As always, I am rooting for you and look forward to hearing how you fare.
Stacy West Clark has been helping Pennsylvania and New Jersey lawyers and law firms expand their practices for more than 30 years. She is a former attorney with Morgan Lewis & Bockius and was the firm's first marketing director. She is president of Stacy Clark Marketing LLC, www.stacyclarkmarketing.com, a firm that helps law firms grow their businesses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElder Litigators Confront Tough Questions in Last Act of Careers
Unlocking Your Lawyers' Rainmaking Potential: A Coaching Guide
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250