Pa. High Court May Need to Untie Case of County With Two DAs
When a district attorney dies in a smaller county in Pennsylvania, typically the office's first assistant is sworn in as the county's top law enforcement official. That process, however, did not happen after Susquehanna's district attorney passed away last month.
January 22, 2018 at 04:42 PM
5 minute read
When a district attorney dies in a smaller county in Pennsylvania, typically the office's first assistant is sworn in as the county's top law enforcement official.
That process, however, did not happen after Susquehanna's district attorney passed away last month, and now two attorneys are claiming to be the county's top prosecutor—with one having taken the oath of office and the other having been appointed by the county's only commissioned judge.
The two lawyers have also taken their fight to the state Supreme Court. Although the case presents an issue of apparent first impression, it will be up to the justices to determine whether they will decide the case on the merits, or send it back to a trial court for further review.
The dispute began after Susquehanna District Attorney Robert Klein died on Dec. 27 at the age of 53. According to court documents, Klein had been suffering from cancer for several months, and he told the prosecutor's office about the condition in either late May or early June.
Following Klein's death, William Urbanski, who had been first assistant under Klein, sent a letter to Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas Judge Jason Legg telling him that he had become the district attorney of the county pursuant to 16 P.S. Section 1404(b), which says that “in a county of the fourth through eighth class, the first assistant district attorney shall become district attorney” if any vacancy occurs. That portion goes on to say, “If the first assistant district attorney is unwilling or unable to serve, the judges of the court of common pleas shall fill the vacancy by the appointment of a competent person.”
However, Legg declined to swear Urbanski in to the position.
According to court papers, Legg instead determined that Urbanski was not a resident of Susquehanna County at the time of Klein's death. Applying Section 1401(a), which says “the district attorney shall be a resident of the county” and “shall have resided in the county for which he is elected or appointed for one year next preceding his election or appointment,” Legg held that Urbanski was therefore “unable to serve” as district attorney.
Despite Legg's holding, Urbanski had Luzerne County Magisterial District Judge James J. Haggerty, a “lifelong friend,” administer the oath of office on Jan. 1, an affidavit from Urbanski said. The ceremony took place at Urbanski's family farm in Rice Township, Luzerne County, with members of Klein's family in attendance.
In the meantime, however, Legg reached out to the Susquehanna Bar Association looking for applicants to fill what he deemed to be the vacant district attorney position, and on Jan. 5, Legg appointed attorney Marion O'Malley as the county's district attorney.
Three days after O'Malley was appointed, Urbanski filed an emergency action with the Supreme Court, arguing that he had not been given a proper hearing on the issue and that the justices should determine him to be the county's top law enforcement officer.
Although the situation has the potential to cause significant confusion for law enforcement within the county, according to court documents, Legg indicated on Jan. 5 that he would would not administer the oath of office to O'Malley and would recognize Urbanski as the acting district attorney until after a judicial determination has been made regarding her appointment. A court document from Legg indicated in a footnote that Urbanski was continuing to “serve as first assistant DA of Susquehanna County and as such possesses the power of the DA in an acting capacity.”
Urbanski's attorney, Bruce L. Castor Jr., said Monday that all the parties have been acting on good terms.
“I think Judge Legg was very prudent,” Castor said. “Nobody is desirous of something blowing up and creating a big county problem.”
O'Malley is being represented by Kleinbard LLC attorney Matthew Haverstick.
“We're hoping for a swift resolution from the Supreme Court that affirms Ms. O'Malley's appointment as the rightful district attorney,” Haverstick said.
Although the parties have been working amicably toward a fast resolution of the dispute, Urbanski, Legg and O'Malley are not without some history.
Before becoming the county's only commissioned judge, Legg served as the county's district attorney and O'Malley served as his first assistant—the only assistant district attorney in the office, according to the Rocket-Courier newspaper.
In 2015, Legg announced his candidacy for a then-vacant spot on the Common Pleas Court bench, and both O'Malley and Klein vied for the position.
O'Malley, who by then had spent nearly 15 years as an assistant district attorney, eventually lost the Republican nomination by 36 votes out of 5,089 cast—less than one hundredth of 1 percent—in the 2015 primary. Klein then ran unopposed in the general election.
Castor said the case presents the Supreme Court with the first-impression issue of how the two sections of the law are meant to be read together.
“What the Supreme Court is going to have to wrestle with is, did the legislature specifically intend to carve out this exception,” Castor said. “A great argument can be made that they did simply because the General Assembly didn't want that conflict of interest, or appearance of one, where you have the one judge appointing the prosecutor, which can come up in these small counties.”
Castor is acting as a special assistant district attorney in the case, according to court papers he filed. He said that Urbanski is paying attorney fees from his own money, and that, after the case is resolved, Urbanski can determine whether to seek to have the county reimburse him for the legal fees.
Attorney A. Taylor Williams of the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania is representing Legg. The AOPC did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readPeople in the News—Jan. 23, 2025—Marshall Dennehey, Duane Morris, Hangley Aronchick
3 minute readPlaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250