Arbitrator Awards Driver Nearly $800K in UIM Claim Following Car Crash
An arbitrator has awarded a man $797,400 for injuries he sustained after being rear-ended while driving his employer's vehicle.
February 01, 2018 at 02:05 PM
3 minute read
Page v. CNA Insurance
$797,400 Arbitration Award
Date of Verdict: Nov. 30.
Court and Case No.: ADR Options.
Judge: Joseph F. Ricchiuti
Type of Action: Underinsured motorist.
Injuries: Neck and knee injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: James Haggerty of Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Richard Mandel, orthopedist; Lee Harris, neurologist; Jasen Walker, vocations; Chad Staller and James Markham, economist.
Defense Counsel: Thane Trotman of the Law Office of Peter A. Callahan, Philadelphia.
Comment:
An arbitrator has awarded a man $797,400 for injuries he sustained after being rear-ended while driving his employer's vehicle.
According to court documents, the plaintiff, Dion Page, had sued his employer's insurance carrier, Valley Forge Insurance Co., which is an affiliate of CNA Insurance Co., seeking recovery of underinsured motorist benefits.
The underlying action, according to Page's arbitration memo, occurred when Page was sitting in his employer's vehicle, which had been stopped on a road in Bucks County. Page's vehicle had its hazard lights flashing, but a vehicle that Daniel McCulloch was driving, rear-ended Page's vehicle, causing him to sustain disabling injuries to his neck and knee.
According to the plaintiff, McCullouch said he had been texting so he had not seen Page's vehicle immediately before the collision.
McCulloch's insurance carrier tendered its policy, which had a $50,000 liability coverage limit, and Page subsequently sought underinsurance coverage from CNA, which had provided a $1 million liability limit for Page's employer.
According to Page's memo, as a result of the accident, Page sustained injuries to several discs in his neck, knee and shoulder sprains, a rotator cuff tear and an aggravation of a cervical degenerative disc disease. Page subsequently underwent a cervical discectomy with fusion, followed by physical therapy, before he underwent a hemi-laminectomy and a complete facetectomy.
Page had been 43 at the time of the accident, and he worked as a laborer. He did not return to work after the accident and was later determined to be disabled by the Social Security Administration, the plaintiff said.
The dispute between Page and CNA focused on Page's economic damages and his comparative negligence, since he had been stopped in a no-parking zone.
The plaintiff's vocational rehabilitation expert, Jasen Walker, contended that Page had an earning capacity ranging from $28,000 to $38,000, and Page claimed to have sustained a net economic loss of more than $670,000.
CNA's attorney Thane Trotman of the Law Office of Peter A. Callahan, however, disputed those figures.
“He had never made a whole lot of money in the first place,” Trotman said. “The future wage loss claim was predicated on numbers that were not reflected on the plaintiff's tax returns.”
The single arbitrator, Joseph F. Ricchiuti ultimately awarded Page $797,000. That amount was later molded to $747,400 to account for the prior $50,000 settlement.
“The arbitrator did a good job in evaluating the claims and making a fair award, which compensated the plaintiff for his injuries,” Page's attorney James Haggerty, of Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith, said. However, Haggerty added that the defendant did not make any offers until very late in the litigation, and so he is considering pursuing a bad faith action.
—Max Mitchell, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Pa. Case Has Ever Adjudicated a Claim to Enforce an Environmental Covenant Imposed Under 'Act 2'—Does That Matter?
7 minute readSuperior Court Rejects Pa. Hospital's Challenge to $7.3M Med Mal Judgment
3 minute readPittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute readDe-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
Trending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250