Pa. Law Firms Among Demand Growth Leaders in 2017, Report Says
Pennsylvania firms continued a trend of outpacing industrywide demand for legal services.
February 12, 2018 at 05:42 PM
3 minute read
Law firms in Pennsylvania outpaced most other regions in demand growth in 2017, as the whole industry fed off a stronger fourth quarter to finish ahead of the previous year, a recent report from Citi Private Bank said.
Pennsylvania law firms surveyed saw revenue increase by 6.4 percent in 2017, which was better than the industrywide average of 4.5 percent, according to Brad Winton, a private banker and senior vice president in Citi Private Bank's law firm group. But expense growth in Pennsylvania also outpaced the rest of the industry.
Demand was up 4.4 percent, which was the second highest increase among all regions surveyed, Winton said.
Industrywide, demand was up just 0.7 percent last year, the bank found. But even that was an improvement over the first nine months of 2016, when demand was down 0.2 percent. It's also better than 2016, when demand grew just 0.1 percent industrywide.
The demand numbers for Pennsylvania showed continuation of a trend that was also reflected in Citi's report for the first three quarters of 2017, which said that demand, rather than rate increases, was driving revenue growth at Pennsylvania firms. Pennsylvania showed rate increases of 2 percent in the fourth quarter, Winton said.
Pennsylvania firms outpaced all other regions in productivity, which was up 1.8 percent for the region. Nationally, productivity was down 0.2 percent industrywide, as lawyer demand growth of 1.7 percent lagged slightly behind head count growth of 1.9 percent.
Head count growth at Pennsylvania firms was up 3.3 percent, which was the second highest among all regions. That may not be surprising, in a year where several firms announced significant mergers or lateral group hires. But equity partner head count was actually down 1.3 percent.
Law firms in Pennsylvania saw expenses grow by 7.4 percent in 2017. Compensation expenses were up 8.5 percent, and operating expenses were up 6.6 percent.
Nationally, expense growth was up 4.5 percent for the year, compared to 3.4 percent in 2016. But, like in Pennsylvania, compensation expenses, up 6.5 percent, grew more than operating expenses, which increased by 3.1 percent.
According to John Wilmouth and Gretta Rusanow of Citi Private Bank, the expense changes reflected an increase in the head count of salaried lawyers and the impact of associate salary increases that began to take effect halfway through 2016.
Citi Private Bank's results are based on a sample of 189 firms, including 81 Am Law 100 firms, 53 firms in the second hundred and 55 niche or boutique firms. According to Wilmouth and Rusanow, law firms in the top 50 of the Am Law 100 performed best in 2017, and they tied niche or boutique firms for the greatest demand growth, at 1.7 percent. Law firms in the second hundred of the Am Law 200, however, saw demand decline.
Global and international firms also performed best in terms of revenue and profitability growth, Citi found, with better results than the national and regional firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readVolunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 3Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 4How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 5Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250