Pa. Law Firms Among Demand Growth Leaders in 2017, Report Says
Pennsylvania firms continued a trend of outpacing industrywide demand for legal services.
February 12, 2018 at 05:42 PM
3 minute read
Law firms in Pennsylvania outpaced most other regions in demand growth in 2017, as the whole industry fed off a stronger fourth quarter to finish ahead of the previous year, a recent report from Citi Private Bank said.
Pennsylvania law firms surveyed saw revenue increase by 6.4 percent in 2017, which was better than the industrywide average of 4.5 percent, according to Brad Winton, a private banker and senior vice president in Citi Private Bank's law firm group. But expense growth in Pennsylvania also outpaced the rest of the industry.
Demand was up 4.4 percent, which was the second highest increase among all regions surveyed, Winton said.
Industrywide, demand was up just 0.7 percent last year, the bank found. But even that was an improvement over the first nine months of 2016, when demand was down 0.2 percent. It's also better than 2016, when demand grew just 0.1 percent industrywide.
The demand numbers for Pennsylvania showed continuation of a trend that was also reflected in Citi's report for the first three quarters of 2017, which said that demand, rather than rate increases, was driving revenue growth at Pennsylvania firms. Pennsylvania showed rate increases of 2 percent in the fourth quarter, Winton said.
Pennsylvania firms outpaced all other regions in productivity, which was up 1.8 percent for the region. Nationally, productivity was down 0.2 percent industrywide, as lawyer demand growth of 1.7 percent lagged slightly behind head count growth of 1.9 percent.
Head count growth at Pennsylvania firms was up 3.3 percent, which was the second highest among all regions. That may not be surprising, in a year where several firms announced significant mergers or lateral group hires. But equity partner head count was actually down 1.3 percent.
Law firms in Pennsylvania saw expenses grow by 7.4 percent in 2017. Compensation expenses were up 8.5 percent, and operating expenses were up 6.6 percent.
Nationally, expense growth was up 4.5 percent for the year, compared to 3.4 percent in 2016. But, like in Pennsylvania, compensation expenses, up 6.5 percent, grew more than operating expenses, which increased by 3.1 percent.
According to John Wilmouth and Gretta Rusanow of Citi Private Bank, the expense changes reflected an increase in the head count of salaried lawyers and the impact of associate salary increases that began to take effect halfway through 2016.
Citi Private Bank's results are based on a sample of 189 firms, including 81 Am Law 100 firms, 53 firms in the second hundred and 55 niche or boutique firms. According to Wilmouth and Rusanow, law firms in the top 50 of the Am Law 100 performed best in 2017, and they tied niche or boutique firms for the greatest demand growth, at 1.7 percent. Law firms in the second hundred of the Am Law 200, however, saw demand decline.
Global and international firms also performed best in terms of revenue and profitability growth, Citi found, with better results than the national and regional firms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLackawanna County Lawyer Fails to Shake Legal Mal Claims Over Sex With Client
3 minute readHarrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Underinsured Driver
3 minute readMiddle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
2 minute readHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 2Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed With Caution
- 3DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 4Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250