Meek Mill Lawyers Say Brinkley, Peruto Improperly Handled Court Transcript
The eight-page motion references Judge Genece Brinkley's decision to hire Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. and contends that Brinkley may have improperly made public a key transcript in the case that had been under seal since February 2016.
February 13, 2018 at 01:43 PM
4 minute read
Imprisoned hip-hop star Meek Mill has renewed his call for Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Genece Brinkley to recuse from his criminal case, citing the judge's recent decision to hire an attorney to help her respond to mounting criticism over her handling of his case.
Mill, whose real name is Robert Williams, filed a supplemental motion for recusal Monday in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Among other things, the eight-page motion references Brinkley's decision to hire Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. and contends that Brinkley may have improperly made public a key transcript in the case that had been under seal since February 2016.
The motion cited media reports, including articles from The Legal, The Philadelphia Inquirer and TMZ, and claims Peruto indicated in interviews that Brinkley had showed him the transcript before it was unsealed and that he had advised Brinkley to release the transcript.
“If so, then the ultimate decision to release the transcript was made (improperly) in an effort by the judge to 'clear her name,' rather than (as it should have been two years ago) in furtherance of Mr. Williams' constitutional right to receive the transcript in aid of his appeal,” the motion filed by Brian McMonagle of McMonagle, Perri, McHugh & Mischak said.
In an emailed statement Peruto said he could not speak for the judge on the motion, but was dismissive of the motion.
“Mill's team can constantly make allegations in the press, about a judge, but God forbid she fight back to prevent her reputation from being ruined. Another example of limitless funds spent to get their way,” Peruto said. “It doesn't go unnoticed they fail to mention their own efforts at contacting the judge, ex parte, in an effort to influence her decision.”
The controversy between Williams and Brinkley has been building since she sentenced the hip-hop star in November to a two- to four-year prison sentence for a probation violation—a sentence that staggered the rapper's supporters. Williams had been on probation for nine years at that point, and the violation for which he received the prison sentence stemmed from two out-of-state incidents that resulted in charges being brought, but later dropped.
Brinkley hired Peruto shortly before she ordered the February 2016 transcript to be unsealed.
Peruto is a Center City Philadelphia lawyer best known as a criminal defense attorney. He recently told The Legal that his representation of Brinkley will take more of an offensive posture, and could take the form of defamation lawsuits filed against the attorneys and entertainment company that he said are behind a campaign to smear Brinkley's credibility.
Williams' legal team has pointed to the February 2016 transcript as evidence that Brinkley had attempted to pressure Williams into dropping his New York-based management team and hiring Philadelphia-based manager Charlie Mack.
The transcript, however, showed that it was Williams' probation officer, not Brinkley, who suggested that Williams should hire Mack. Although the transcript of the Feb. 5, 2016, hearing showed that Mack was the focus of much of the in-chambers discussion, several media outlets said the transcript was a setback for Williams' defense team.
Williams' latest motion, however, contended that the transcript still indicated that Brinkley should step away from the case.
“During this length[y] and repeated commentary by her probation officer and the assistant district attorney, Judge Brinkley remained largely silent and never interjected either an expression of disagreement or any suggestion that their comments were inappropriate or inaccurate, or did not reflect her 'mission,'” the motion said.
The motion also cited the unsealed transcript as indicating that Brinkley “personally selected” the probation officer to handle Williams' case.
Joe Tacopina of Tacopina & Seigel, who is one of Williams' lead attorneys, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250