Meek Mill Lawyers Say Brinkley, Peruto Improperly Handled Court Transcript
The eight-page motion references Judge Genece Brinkley's decision to hire Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. and contends that Brinkley may have improperly made public a key transcript in the case that had been under seal since February 2016.
February 13, 2018 at 01:43 PM
4 minute read
Meek Mill. Photo: Shutterstock.com
Imprisoned hip-hop star Meek Mill has renewed his call for Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Genece Brinkley to recuse from his criminal case, citing the judge's recent decision to hire an attorney to help her respond to mounting criticism over her handling of his case.
Mill, whose real name is Robert Williams, filed a supplemental motion for recusal Monday in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Among other things, the eight-page motion references Brinkley's decision to hire Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. and contends that Brinkley may have improperly made public a key transcript in the case that had been under seal since February 2016.
The motion cited media reports, including articles from The Legal, The Philadelphia Inquirer and TMZ, and claims Peruto indicated in interviews that Brinkley had showed him the transcript before it was unsealed and that he had advised Brinkley to release the transcript.
“If so, then the ultimate decision to release the transcript was made (improperly) in an effort by the judge to 'clear her name,' rather than (as it should have been two years ago) in furtherance of Mr. Williams' constitutional right to receive the transcript in aid of his appeal,” the motion filed by Brian McMonagle of McMonagle, Perri, McHugh & Mischak said.
In an emailed statement Peruto said he could not speak for the judge on the motion, but was dismissive of the motion.
“Mill's team can constantly make allegations in the press, about a judge, but God forbid she fight back to prevent her reputation from being ruined. Another example of limitless funds spent to get their way,” Peruto said. “It doesn't go unnoticed they fail to mention their own efforts at contacting the judge, ex parte, in an effort to influence her decision.”
The controversy between Williams and Brinkley has been building since she sentenced the hip-hop star in November to a two- to four-year prison sentence for a probation violation—a sentence that staggered the rapper's supporters. Williams had been on probation for nine years at that point, and the violation for which he received the prison sentence stemmed from two out-of-state incidents that resulted in charges being brought, but later dropped.
Brinkley hired Peruto shortly before she ordered the February 2016 transcript to be unsealed.
Peruto is a Center City Philadelphia lawyer best known as a criminal defense attorney. He recently told The Legal that his representation of Brinkley will take more of an offensive posture, and could take the form of defamation lawsuits filed against the attorneys and entertainment company that he said are behind a campaign to smear Brinkley's credibility.
Williams' legal team has pointed to the February 2016 transcript as evidence that Brinkley had attempted to pressure Williams into dropping his New York-based management team and hiring Philadelphia-based manager Charlie Mack.
The transcript, however, showed that it was Williams' probation officer, not Brinkley, who suggested that Williams should hire Mack. Although the transcript of the Feb. 5, 2016, hearing showed that Mack was the focus of much of the in-chambers discussion, several media outlets said the transcript was a setback for Williams' defense team.
Williams' latest motion, however, contended that the transcript still indicated that Brinkley should step away from the case.
“During this length[y] and repeated commentary by her probation officer and the assistant district attorney, Judge Brinkley remained largely silent and never interjected either an expression of disagreement or any suggestion that their comments were inappropriate or inaccurate, or did not reflect her 'mission,'” the motion said.
The motion also cited the unsealed transcript as indicating that Brinkley “personally selected” the probation officer to handle Williams' case.
Joe Tacopina of Tacopina & Seigel, who is one of Williams' lead attorneys, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250