Youth Sport Groups, Municipality Hit With $1.7M Verdict Over Baseball Brain Injury
An Allegheny County jury has awarded $1.7 million to the family of a boy who was struck in the head by a foul ball during a youth baseball game and suffered a brain injury.
February 14, 2018 at 04:23 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Shutterstock
An Allegheny County jury has awarded $1.7 million to the family of a boy who was struck in the head by a foul ball during a youth baseball game and suffered a brain injury.
The verdict came after an eight-day trial before Judge Patrick Connelly in the case Hoffman v. Borough of Sewickley. Along with awarding the money, the jury also found liability against two athletic associations and the municipality that owned the field where the injury occurred.
The plaintiff, Zachary Hoffman, was hit by the ball after it flew through a large gap in the fence of the dugout that his team was in.
According to attorney Alan Perer of Swensen & Perer, who represented the Hoffmans, the jury was likely persuaded by evidence that a similar incident occurred at the same field a year before, and that none of the dugout fences on the other fields where the teams regularly played had gaps that would have allowed for a foul ball to pass through.
“We're so happy with the jury's verdict and that he's going to get the best care he needs on an ongoing basis,” Perer said.
According to the verdict sheet, the jury found the Quaker Valley Recreation Association 50 percent liable, the Borough of Sewickley, which owned and operated the field, 40 percent liable, and the Avonworth Athletic Association 10 percent liable.
Thomas, Thomas & Hafer attorney John Giunta, who represented the Avonworth Athletic Association, which operated the team that Hoffman played for, said his client had reached a confidential settlement with the Hoffmans after closings, but prior to the verdict. He declined to comment further about the case.
According to court records, Hoffman was 11 in the spring of 2015 when he was hit on the head by the ball. Hoffman had been playing for the Avonworth Athletic Association against a Quaker Valley Recreation Association team. The teams were playing on a field that was owned and maintained by the Borough of Sewickley, and it was an away game for Hoffman's team.
The dugout was largely covered in wire fencing, but according to Hoffman's pretrial memo, there was an 11-foot-wide opening in the fence. The memo further noted that the first base line was less than 18 feet away from the player bench within the dugout.
The Hoffmans contended the gap in the fence went against Little League customs of having the dugout entirely fenced in. The plaintiffs also contended there were similar incidents where foul balls had struck players sitting on the dugout bench, including one where a player was hit in the chest a year before.
The field also failed to meet safety standards, and the teams further failed to provide sufficient warnings about the possibility of foul balls flying into the dugout, the Hoffmans alleged.
After the incident, Hoffman was taken to Sewickley Hospital where a CT scan showed he had a traumatic intracerebral bleed. He underwent a craniotomy that night.
According to his pretrial memo, Hoffman has suffered headaches since the accident, and he also has become more aggressive and has had difficulty controlling his emotions. The memo also noted that Hoffman has had trouble at school and has required special education and treatment.
In its pretrial memo, the borough and Quaker Valley Recreation Association said that being hit by a fly ball is a known risk of baseball, and that the field met the National Little League's rules regarding dugout fences.
Although the defendants each also contended that they should be immune from the suit, the jury also found that their conduct fell “substantially below” the generally practiced standards, which allowed the plaintiffs to overcome the immunity claims.
More than $1 million of the jury's award was for future medical expenses. The jury also awarded slightly more than $100,000 for past medical expenses, and $566,000 for past and future pain and suffering.
Dennis Mulvihill of Robb Leonard Mulvihill, who represented the borough and Quaker Valley Recreation Association, did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Finds Neiman Marcus Liable in Personal Injury Suit for Unsecured 13-Pound Painting
4 minute readEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250