Ballard Spahr Revenue Up 3.4 Percent, PPP Up 5.6 Percent
In a year when it announced two significant mergers, Ballard Spahr was more profitable than expected.
February 20, 2018 at 05:16 PM
6 minute read
Ballard Spahr posted increases in both revenue and profits per partner last year, according to preliminary ALM reporting, while overall lawyer head count declined slightly from 2016.
The firm also announced two significant mergers in 2017, though the larger deal—with Minneapolis-based Lindquist & Vennum—did not take effect until this year.
Revenue increased by 3.4 percent in 2017, to $353.3 million, and revenue per lawyer rose 6 percent to $685,000.
Profits per equity partner rose 5.6 percent from $604,000, reaching $638,000 in 2017. Net income was flat at $139.6 million.
“It was better than we had expected, and I think even better from our perspective in light of the fact that we also were involved in two pretty significant transactions during the year,” said chairman Mark Stewart, noting the firm's merger deals with Lindquist & Vennum and media law boutique Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
“When we made our projections we didn't know [those deals would happen],” Stewart continued. “It would have been understandable if there was some loss.”
While acknowledging rate pressures affected certain practices, Stewart said the firm exceeded its expectations in terms of PPP, and all practices were “up a little.”
Real estate was profitable, and the litigation practice was busy, he said, with an especially active year in the Delaware Chancery Court. And the firm's public finance group “had a huge fourth quarter,” Stewart said, due to changes in the tax law that left clients scrambling for answers.
Clients also sought to push through certain transactions before year-end as the proposed tax bill evolved in the fall, as they worried about how tax implications for those deals might change in 2018, Stewart said.
Ballard Spahr prepaid some of its own 2018 expenses, Stewart said, knowing they might not be deductible under new tax laws this year. And the firm took some efficiency measures, including updating its technology and project management. It also closed an office in San Diego, where “we weren't able to accomplish … what we wanted to accomplish.”
|Merger Spree
Ballard Spahr had 516 lawyers in 2017, a decrease of 2.5 percent, while the partnership tier shrank by 5.2 percent to 219. The firm has no nonequity tier.
At the same time, the firm announced two mergers that added to its ranks.
As of Jan. 1, Minneapolis-based midsize firm Lindquist & Vennum merged into Ballard Spahr. The deal was announced just after Labor Day in 2017. Lindquist & Vennum had over 150 lawyers, and accounting for practices that separated from the firm before the merger became official, Ballard Spahr netted an additional 107 lawyers from the deal.
Less than two weeks later, Ballard Spahr announced another combination that was effective immediately, acquiring 25 lawyers from Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
Those lawyers “rocketed the media practice to the very top,” Stewart said, referring to late 2017 performance. “While we had that practice [before the merger], it wasn't anything like what it is now.”
Stewart said already in 2017, the Levine Sullivan lawyers were creating business not just in their own practice area, but in others as well. And the addition has been helpful in attracting other potential lateral hires, he said.
“It's been a real pleasure to watch their reputation have an effect,” Stewart said.
The two deals came after a merger drought of sorts for Ballard Spahr, whose last significant combination was its 2013 acquisition of Stillman & Friedman, a white-collar and securities litigation boutique that provided Ballard Spahr entry into New York.
After the 2013 deal, Stewart said he told the firm its focus should be on strengthening existing practice groups through smaller group acquisitions.
For a while, “nothing came to me or to the firm that was so attractive that made me rethink that,” he said. “Then at our annual meeting in 2016, I changed my view a bit because it was really difficult to add a couple here and a couple there and get the impact we were looking for.”
|Looking Ahead
Integration will be a top priority for 2018, Stewart said, and that started before the Lindquist & Vennum deal became official. So far, it's gone better than he expected, he said.
The firm has no major lateral hires on the table, Stewart said. But he did note that Lindquist & Vennum's strength in corporate transactions and litigation has made that a greater area of focus for the firm, which it might want to enhance in some markets like Atlanta. The white-collar practice will likely continue to grow, he said, and the real estate finance group in New York.
Predicting the effect of both mergers on 2018 financial results is tricky, Stewart said, and it's likely Ballard Spahr will have a flat year in terms of profits, even though revenue will grow.
“We're also trying to be honest with ourselves that the integration of two firms is not easy and there will be time lost to do that right,” Stewart said. “At the same time, there's not a day that goes by that I don't get a report that a former Lindquist person got a matter they would not have previously got because of our resources.”
Since September the firm has gotten more calls from law firms looking to combine, Stewart said, but there are no firm plans on future mergers. Still, the calls are “flattering,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 2The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 3Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
- 4Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 5Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250