Time Has Been Up: Why Your Firm Shouldn't Just Be 'Talking' About Diversity and Inclusion
With the recent #MeToo and #TimesUp movements aimed at sexual harassment in the workplace, and employers facing more and more discrimination lawsuits, it is time that employers face the fact that we need diversity and inclusion in our workplace in order to succeed.
February 22, 2018 at 11:35 AM
8 minute read
It's not surprising that most efforts surrounding workplace diversity come in the beginning of the year when Americans celebrate Black History Month in February and Women's History Month in March, which also coincides with International Women's Day on March 8. While both celebrate the achievements and historical contributions made by African Americans and women, as employers, our conversations shouldn't be starting—or ending—there. In fact, “conversations” around workplace diversity and inclusion aren't enough, they need to be backed up with action. With the recent #MeToo and #TimesUp movements aimed at sexual harassment in the workplace, and employers facing more and more discrimination lawsuits, it is time that employers face the fact that we need diversity and inclusion in our workplace in order to succeed. To clarify, workplace diversity means representing a wide range of backgrounds and perspectives, while inclusion means including and integrating all types of individuals into your organization. It's important to understand both of these because while one can happen without the other, neither are successful alone. To put it simply, Vernā Myers, acclaimed author, speaker and diversity and inclusion consultant said it perfectly when she said, “Diversity is being invited to the party. Inclusion is being asked to dance.”
Andrew Glincher, CEO and managing partner of Nixon Peabody, said “Diversity is the future; embrace it or you're obsolete.” Yet it's been just 15 months since Glincher spoke with Bonnie Marcus for her Forbes article and it seems that for most law firms, nothing really has changed. Marcus's article, written in October 2016, still included this disappointing law firm diversity statistic: “Over 75 percent of firm partners are still white male, with women at less than 20 percent and minorities just slightly over 5 percent.” According to the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) 2017 Report on Diversity in U.S. Law Firms, published in December 2017, while both women and African-American partners in law firms increased slightly in 2016 and 2017, their representative numbers are still lower than they were in 2009. The report also showed that lawyers with disabilities (regardless of race or gender) have, and continue to be, scarcely represented, while LGBT lawyers have showed a slight increase over the last few years.
Firm size and location pay a factor in how successful or unsuccessful firms are in their diversity and inclusion goals. NALP Executive Director James Leipol stated in the report that “there are significant differences by law firm size and geography, and there are many jurisdictions where the disparities in representation are stark. Consider, for instance, that in Miami 33 percent of partners are minorities while in Boston the figure stands at just 5 percent, or that in New York City 27 percent of associates are minorities while in the racially diverse city of Charlotte minorities make up just 14 percent of associates.” Finally, while most categories saw small increases in 2017, minority women continue to be the most underrepresented group at the partner level in law firms, regardless of firm size or jurisdiction.
But the fact of the matter is, while many firms are finally recognizing the achievements of their diverse workforce, many law firms still lack significant diversity around their management tables. So what can firms do in order to meaningfully implement and develop a governing body that accurately reflects their diverse employee body? First, top management has to be willing to support the firm's diversity and inclusion initiatives. Without direct, and public, support from managing and other partners it will be hard to affect change. Like all policy and culture changes, without top management's support, it's a very hard sell. Second, because promotions and other opportunities need to be earned and not just given, firms need to ensure that their diverse lawyers are provided ample opportunities to be in a position for promotion. For instance, if your firm still derives partner compensation from origination credit, diverse lawyers need a seat at the table by participating in those client pitches and in other such opportunities that determine that piece of attorney compensation. Third, while a mentoring program can do wonders, it does nothing if it's in name only. Mentors need to be actively engaged with their junior mentees whether that be from a practice standpoint to business development to firm governance. Without interest and involvement from both parties mentor programs rarely work. Law firms have no excuse to not only be embracing diversity but to be ensuring that decision-makers and other top influencers at the firm are diverse and that their voices are heard and valued.
But for firms still struggling to find ways to successfully incorporate diversity and inclusion in their workplace, there are many outside resources available. The American Bar Association, NALP and the National LGBT Bar Association all have online resources, committees and in-person conferences on diversity and inclusion. The Association of Legal Administrators (ALA) diversity and inclusion committee “aims to increase awareness of and sensitivity to the differences among our workforce and to advance the concept of inclusiveness and acceptance.” Law firm members have a cadre of information and tools available to them including educational programming, publications, speakers, monthly tips and “scorecards.” ALA's scorecard helps law office administrators identify best practices (and areas for which their firms need improvement) and is broken down into seven categories: formal firm leadership; firm culture; firm policies and workplace inclusion; professional development; organizational diversity and inclusion competency; community involvement; and supplier diversity.
There are also several associations geared toward supporting and promoting diverse and women attorneys within your law firm. Founded in 2009, the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity (LCLD) has more than 275 members, who serve as either general counsel of major corporations or law firm managing partners. Law firm members can participate in any one of the organization's many programs that are geared towards junior associates, senior associates who are on the track to partnership, and current firm partners. For those lawyers that have founded, or work at, minority-, women- or LGBT-owned law firms, additional options are available. The National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF) is a nonprofit trade organization with over 180 minority- and women-owned law firms across 40 states that is dedicated to promoting diversity and fostering relationships between Fortune 500 companies and diverse outside legal counsel. Women Owned Law, which was founded here in Philadelphia in 2016 by attorney Nicole Galli, is a “national networking group for women-owned law and legal services firms” whose “mission is to provide opportunities for women legal entrepreneurs to come together, support each other and help our businesses prosper.” Then there is Gay and Lesbian Lawyers of Philadelphia (GALLOP) which is “an organization of gay and lesbian legal professionals serving the Philadelphia metropolitan area.”
It's clear that changes in the legal profession are long overdue and the time is up for those who are not taking advantage of and fostering their diverse workforce. Firms can no longer buck the trend of workplace diversity because without these initiatives there could be no future for your firm. Employees are no longer willing to tolerate, work at or support employers that do not support them. Hopefully, there will be a time when diversity isn't a trend but just a way of life. Kerra Bolton's recent article for CNN discusses whether or not we need to revisit the idea of Black History Month. Bolton states that we need to ensure “that Black History Month is not a one-time event, but a sustainable practice throughout the year.” Bolton is right. We shouldn't need a reason to celebrate the history of certain individuals who changed our way of life. We should be living every day celebrating, participating and enhancing the path of those individuals. As the saying goes, actions speak louder than words—so now it's time to see some action.
Jessica L. Mazzeo is chief operating officer of Griesing Law, where she focuses on overseeing and implementing all of the firm's business operations while establishing policies that promote and retain the firm's culture and strategic vision. In addition to her role at the firm, Mazzeo is on the Board of Directors of the Philadelphia Chapter of the Association of Legal Administrations and is a volunteer for the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms and the Women's Business Enterprise Council of PA-DE-sNJ. Contact her at 215-732-3922 or [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Time to Act: A Call for Accountability Amid a Crisis of Female Representation
8 minute readBeyond Salary: Considerations for Law Students Selecting Their First Law Firm
7 minute readCommunication Breakdown: Are Generational Divides Affecting Law Firms?
Trending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250