Court Rejects Malpractice Coverage for Lamb McErlane in Estate Case
A federal judge said the claim originated before the policy began, when the estate beneficiaries alleged excessive fees in a letter to the court.
February 26, 2018 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has sided with Allied World Insurance Co. in a legal malpractice insurance dispute involving West Chester-based Lamb McErlane, leaving the law firm uncovered for a $557,001 claim.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Timothy Rice of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted Allied World's motion for judgment on the pleadings on Feb. 23, ruling that the claim originated in May 2015, more than a year before the law firm's policy period began. Rice said a May 2015 letter outlining allegations against the firm constituted a claim.
A Chester County judge ordered the firm last year to disgorge $4.3 million in legal fees billed in its work for Charles Norris as executor of Sir John Thouron's estate. Chester County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark Tunnell Jr. said the firm breached its fiduciary duty to the estate. He also ordered the firm to pay back more than $135,000 to the estate of one of Thouron's beneficiaries, and surcharged Norris and Lamb McErlane $557,001 for losses to the estate resulting from a tax penalty.
According to Rice's opinion, Lamb McErlane represented the executor from 2006 to 2017. In April 2013, the estate beneficiaries objected to the costs, and in May 2015, they submitted a letter to the Chester County Orphans' Court alleging that Norris and Lamb McErlane charged excessive fees.
“This letter alleged Lamb McErlane had performed 'flawed and inadequate' work, 'grossly mismanaged' the federal tax filing process, and negligently 'fail[ed] to check a box,' leading to a tax penalty in excess of $500,000,” Rice wrote.
In June 2016, Allied World agreed to insure Lamb McErlane against professional liability claims made between June 20, 2016, and June 20, 2017. And in March 2017, Tunnell's order held the firm liable for the $557,001 tax loss.
Lamb McErlane sought coverage from Allied World for that amount, but the insurer argued that the claim originated in May 2015, when the beneficiaries filed their letter.
Rice agreed. “The firm's argument is an attempt to rewrite the policy to permit a claim only after an insured is faced with a viable cause of action in a formal legal proceeding,” his opinion said. “Although the beneficiaries were precluded from bringing a malpractice claim directly against Lamb McErlane in the estate proceedings, they were permitted to object to excessive legal fees already paid by the estate. They not only did so, they notified Lamb McErlane of their objections to Lamb McErlane's legal work.”
In the underlying matter, Lamb McErlane filed an appeal to Tunnell's decision in June. Lamb McErlane filed a praecipe for discontinuance Feb. 13. Firm chairman Joel Frank said the firm reached a confidential settlement in that matter more than a month ago.
Frank said the firm is not covered by any other policy for the $557,001 claim.
Robert Bodzin of Kleinbard LLC represented Allied World and did not return a call seeking comment.
In the underlying case, John Chesney of Drinker Biddle & Reath is representing the estate's beneficiaries. He could not be reached for comment Monday. Patrick O'Connor of Cozen O'Connor, who represents the law firm in that matter, did not respond to a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250