Sex Abuse Lawsuit Against Scranton School for the Deaf Settles Midtrial
A lawsuit against The Scranton School for Deaf and Hard of Hearing filed by parents who alleged their daughter had been repeatedly sexually assaulted by a classmate has settled in the middle of trial.
February 27, 2018 at 05:39 PM
3 minute read
A lawsuit against The Scranton School for Deaf and Hard of Hearing filed by parents who alleged their daughter had been repeatedly sexually assaulted by a classmate has settled in the middle of trial.
The terms of the settlement, reached Monday night, are confidential. The case was in its second week of trial. The family's attorney, John Elliott of Elliott Greenleaf, declined to comment beyond confirming the case was resolved.
The lawsuit filed in the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas alleged that for six months in 2009 to 2010 the school failed to protect the then 8-year-old girl, identified as S.C. in the case, from another 13-year-old female student who sexually assaulted her on multiple occasions, also alleging that the school tried to cover up the abuse. The Legal does not name victims of abuse.
According to court documents, the victim's mother took her daughter to the emergency room after noticing rectal bleeding. She subsequently reported child abuse to the authorities.
However, the lawsuit also claimed, the school never checked its records on the 13-year-old, referred to as Jane Doe in court papers, to see if there was a pattern of misconduct after the first complaint of inappropriate touching was made, and ultimately put S.C. back in the same dormitory room with her alleged abuser.
“These sexual—repeated sexual assaults triggered a tragic chain of events that have severely impaired [S.C.] socially, educationally and emotionally,” Elliott told the jury in his opening remarks, according to a trial transcript. “She became fearful of others and fearful of living in a dormitory. And she lost the cultural home that her parents believed was the best vehicle for her to achieve human potential and nourish her human dignity.”
Anne Schmidt Frankel of Burns White represents the Scranton School and declined to comment.
Attorneys for the school argued in court papers that it couldn't be labeled negligent for what happened to S.C. because there was no reason to suspect child abuse. They also claimed the child's injuries were not severe and that her accusations were coaxed out of her by “leading and inappropriate questioning” from a doctor.
The school's court papers said the police issued an affidavit of probable cause before the investigation was complete and without interviewing Doe. Additionally, no charges of failure to report abuse were filed against school officials by police.
The defendants noted that the first instance of alleged abuse happened in a girls' bathroom and lasted less than a minute.
“The presence of two girls in the bathroom for a minute or less, fully clothed, even when one alleges a touching, did not not lead to a reasonable cause to suspect child abuse for those investigating,” the school's court papers said.
S.C.'s family sought compensatory and punitive damages against the school and its management entity, the Western Pennsylvania School for the Deaf.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
- 2New York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
- 3'You Can’t Do a First Draft of Common Sense': Microsoft GC Jon Palmer Talks AI, Litigation, and Leadership
- 4About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 5Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250