Blank Rome Inks Deal With Accusers in Ponzi Scheme Case
The firm reached a proposed settlement over claims that it helped bilk millions from Philadelphia real estate investors.
March 02, 2018 at 12:20 PM
3 minute read
Blank Rome has reached a settlement agreement with a group of investors who allege the law firm was part of a real estate investment scheme in which they lost millions.
In a filing late Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the investor plaintiffs—Kilbride Investments Ltd., Busystore Ltd. and Bergfeld Co. Ltd.—moved to dismiss Blank Rome from their lawsuit. According to the filing, the plaintiffs and Blank Rome agreed to settle after a two-day mediation. A federal judge must still sign off on the agreement.
Blank Rome agreed that any judgment in the lawsuit would be reduced by the percentage share of liability attributed to Blank Rome. And that amount must be no less than the amount Blank Rome has agreed to pay in the settlement, which was not disclosed in the filing.
Two of the other defendants in the case, Cushman & Wakefield and JFK BLVD Acquisition GP, agreed to sign a stipulation acknowledging Blank Rome's dismissal from the case and agreeing that the final judgment would be reduced by the amount of Blank Rome's liability. But the other law firm defendant, Cozen O'Connor, refused to do so, the filing said.
The investor plaintiffs have claimed that Charles Naselsky, a disbarred lawyer who had worked at Cozen O'Connor until 2006 before joining Blank Rome, conspired with Philadelphia real estate developers to get the investors to put more than $27 million into a project that ultimately would be barred by zoning restrictions.
The investors alleged that the law firms were part of a scheme orchestrated by Eliyahu Weinstein, who was convicted of fraud and sentenced to 22 years in prison for operating a massive Ponzi scheme that stole money from members of the Orthodox Jewish community under the guise of investing in Philadelphia real estate projects.
Both law firms have fought the claims. They filed motions for summary judgment last year, asserting that the investors were only suing them because they were not able to recover damages from Weinstein.
Last week, U.S. District Senior Judge Jan DuBois of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted Cozen O'Connor's motion in part, ruling that the law firm could not be found liable for Naselsky's actions during the period when he was not employed at Cozen O'Connor.
John Harkins Jr. of Harkins Cunningham in Philadelphia represents Blank Rome. He said Blank Rome “certainly knew nothing about what [Naselsky's] clients were allegedly doing.”
Mary Kay Brown of Brown McGarry Nimeroff represents the plaintiffs. Jayne Risk of DLA Piper in Philadelphia represents Cushman & Wakefield, and William Harvey of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg represents Cozen O'Connor. They did not respond immediately to calls seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWeber Gallagher Snags Vaughan Baio Leader in Bid to Broaden Litigation Portfolio
4 minute readBusiness Litigation Firm Sees Founding Partner Leave for Spinoff With Pa., NY, NJ Offices
4 minute readPhila. Litigation Boutiques Dailey LLP and Levan Legal Announce Merger
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250