Duane Morris Revenue, Profits Inch Up for Record Year
The firm saw modest growth in key financial metrics last year.
March 08, 2018 at 05:42 PM
4 minute read
With modest increases in its financial metrics in 2017, Duane Morris pulled through with a record year for revenue, profits per partner and revenue per lawyer.
The firm grew revenue 2.6 percent in 2017, reaching $466 million. Revenue per lawyer was up 1.1 percent, to $706,000.
The firm grew profitability at a similar pace. Profits per equity partner increased by 2.7 percent, to $964,000 and net income was up 2.7 percent, to $117.1 million.
The firm saw total lawyer head count increase by 1.4 percent, to 660 lawyers, while the size of the equity partnership was unchanged at 122 partners.
“We were very happy with 2017,” said Matthew Taylor, who took over as Duane Morris' chairman officially at the start of 2018. “A lot of the gross revenue [gains] you see from firms this year were with head count … we did it with some very good activity on the billable side, and in a year when we probably had one of our lowest amounts on contingency fee.”
|Being Nimble
Taylor said Duane Morris met and exceeded its budget for 2017 and prepaid expenses for 2018. While some contingency fees came in later than expected, he said, those fees have already had an impact on 2018, and will likely create a boost in this year's revenue.
The first quarter of 2017 was “sluggish” across the firm, Taylor said, but activity picked up in the late second quarter through fourth quarter on both the transactional and litigation fronts. Intellectual property in particular was “incredibly busy,” he said.
The firm was able to implement “modest” rate increases, Taylor said. But it has also been responsive to client requests for additional flexibility.
“We continue to maintain a very nimble approach on rates to meet our clients' needs, because clients are asking us to be creative on fees, or alternative fees, or approaches on billing that help them and their budgets,” he said.
That also shows through in the firm's realization rate, Taylor said, which was “well over 90 percent.” Practice group heads have been placing an increased emphasis on working efficiently on matters, he said.
“What we have really preached and our lawyers are doing a much better job of is being project managers on their files, whether it's transactional or in litigation,” Taylor said.
|'Growth Spurt'
While Duane Morris saw little change in its overall head count average in 2017, the firm made some notable additions later in the year, adding an office in Austin, Texas, as well as some lawyers in San Francisco late in the year from now-shuttered Sedgwick.
Taylor noted that the firm made a number of lateral hires early this year, including another partner duo from Sedgwick, three lawyers from insurance litigation boutique Vocke Law Group and white-collar litigator Christopher Casey from Hogan Lovells.
“We've had a real growth spurt,” Taylor said, adding the growth will likely continue, especially in the transactional practices. He said the firm is bullish about adding lawyers in New York, Texas, California and even Philadelphia, which, Taylor said, has the potential to become a center for the technology industry.
The firm will also look to continue expanding its presence in Asia, but “we're going to be very, very careful,” Taylor said. Most recently, the firm opened an office in Taiwan in 2016.
Taylor said he's not opposed to mergers as Duane Morris grows, but he would evaluate them case by case.
“We know how difficult they are to do for lots of reasons, mostly conflicts,” he said of the potential to combine with another firm. “I wouldn't rule out any size big or small. Obviously the bigger the size, the level of difficulty gets higher.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The World Didn't End This Morning': Phila. Firm Leaders Respond to Election Results
4 minute readSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 2Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 3Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 4Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 5People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250