Clearing Waiver Hurdle, Plaintiff Wins $3.2M Verdict After Charity Bike Ride Fall
A bicyclist injured after hitting a pothole during a charity bike ride has won a more than $3 million verdict against Philadelphia and the event's organizer, despite having initially signed a waiver.
March 13, 2018 at 02:07 PM
4 minute read
A bicyclist injured after hitting a pothole during a charity bike ride has won a more than $3 million verdict against Philadelphia and the event's organizer, despite having initially signed a waiver.
The jury deliberating in Degliomini v. City of Philadelphia awarded plaintiff Anthony Degliomini and his wife, Karen Degliomini, nearly $3.19 million after an eight-day trial in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Frederica Massiah-Jackson's courtroom. The jury found 90 percent liability against Philadelphia and 10 percent liability against the event organizer, ESM Productions, and awarded more than $1.4 million in future lost wages and earning capacity.
The suit arose after Anthony Degliomini struck a sinkhole during the 20-mile Phillies Charities Bike Ride in 2015. As a result of the fall, Degliomini sustained multiple facial lacerations and spinal cord injuries that resulted in partial paralysis.
According to Villari, Lentz & Lynam attorney Thomas Lynam, who, along with Leonard Villari, tried the case on behalf of the plaintiffs, the fact that Degliomini signed a liability waiver before the race was a large dispute in the litigation, but, at trial, pictures of the sinkhole were persuasive for the jury.
“The picture of the sinkhole carried the day,” Lynam said. “The jury was of the opinion that the city needs to hold their streets department accountable.”
Degliomini's pretrial memo said the event took place in May 2015, and the bike route went through South Philadelphia, as well as the Center City and Art Museum sections of Philadelphia. While riding in the 200 block of Pattison Avenue in South Philadelphia, Degliomini struck the sinkhole, which he contended had not been marked in any way.
J. Lucas Elrath, a bicycling expert for Degliomini, opined that the defendants “failed in almost every way imaginable in terms of event safety,” Degliomini's pretrial memo said.
Degliomini, who was 53 at the time and working as a client relations manager, was knocked unconscious in the crash, and was taken by paramedics to Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. He underwent immediate surgery to stop the swelling in his spine, and also underwent a fusion procedure that included implanting screws and rods. He spent five days in the hospital before being transferred to a rehabilitation facility, where he remained for nearly three weeks.
Degliomini walks with a pronounced limp, and has post-traumatic stress disorder, his pretrial memo said.
Although the defendants largely did not contest the damages, they contended that Degliomini was liable for the accident because he passed the event's official pace car, which participants had been told not to do. The defendants also contested whether he struck the sinkhole, since he had no recollection of the collision.
The defendants further contended that the waiver Degliomini signed relieved them of all liability.
Lynam said the plaintiffs presented two arguments regarding the waiver.
First, he said, the plaintiffs contended that the city could not waive its liability since, under the Home Rule Charter, it has a statutory duty to maintain the streets.
The plaintiffs also argued, according to Lynam, that, when it comes to waiving prior acts of negligence, those prior acts need to be specifically outlined in the waiver. Since the sinkhole had existed for at least nine months before the accident and had not been specified in the waiver, liability for the sinkhole had not been waived, Lynam contended.
The court, according to Lynam, ruled in favor of the Degliominis at the nonsuit stage.
After two hours of deliberations the jury awarded more than $1.4 million in lost wages, $1 million in noneconomic damages, more than $675,000 in medical expenses, and $100,000 to Karen Degliomini for loss of consortium.
Sheldon Kivell of the Philadelphia Law Department represented the city, and Lisa Apelian, legal staff for Zurich North America, represented ESM Productions.
Mike Dunn, a spokesman for the city, said it was still reviewing the verdict and had no further comment. Apelian did not return a message seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTruck Collision Defendants Claim Verdict Slip Issues Spurred Jury's $29M Award
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Feds Chide Defense Attorney Alex Spiro for Extrajudicial Comments in NYC's Adams Case
- 2These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
- 3‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
- 4'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
- 5Energy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250