Aria Health Hit With Verdict After Patient Jumps From Window
Aria Health System has been hit with a roughly $5.7 million verdict after a mentally impaired man admitted for self-inflicted stab wounds was left alone and leaped out of a fourth-floor window.
March 23, 2018 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
Williams v. Aria Health
$5.7M Verdict
Date of Verdict:
March 8.
Court and Case No.:
C.P. Philadelphia No. 150800587.
Judge:
John M. Younge.
Type of Action:
Medical malpractice.
Injuries:
Broken jaw, ankles and heels; fractured his vertebrae.
Plaintiffs Counsel:
Thomas Duffy, Duffy + Partners, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel:
Peter J. Hoffman, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Philadelphia.
Comment:
Aria Health System has been hit with a roughly $5.7 million verdict after a mentally impaired man admitted for self-inflicted stab wounds was left alone and leaped out of a fourth-floor window.
The Philadelphia jury that heard plaintiff Charles P. Williams' case against Aria, owner of Aria Frankford and Torresdale Hospitals, where Williams was treated, awarded him $5.5 million for pain and suffering and $215,000 for economic loss. Williams' lawsuit claimed that Aria failed to properly monitor him under its care and failed to diagnose him as a suicide risk.
Williams was taken to Aria's hospital in the Frankford neighborhood of Philadelphia at 4 a.m. July 17, 2014. Police initially thought he had been the victim of an assault and intoxicated by narcotics use, but a drug test came back negative, according to the plaintiff's court papers. Police later established that it was Williams who stabbed himself in the abdomen multiple times, though the wounds were superficial.
He was transferred to Aria Torresdale at 7 a.m., with the ambulance crew noting he was incoherent and speaking rapidly. According to court papers, Dr. Clifton Hall wrote in a preoperative report that Williams “appears to be psychiatrically impaired.”
At 10 a.m. Williams was sent to a fourth-floor room for monitoring, where he sat quietly for nearly 14 hours until he smashed a window with a chair and leaped out, landing on the lawn below, court papers said.
Williams' lawyer said the man suffered a broken jaw, ankles and heels, and fractured his vertebrae, requiring extensive surgery.
Thomas Duffy of Duffy + Partners in Philadelphia, who represented Williams, said the hospital was clearly at fault, and lauded the jury's verdict.
“I thought it was a fair and correct result,” he said. “I think the negligence of the hospital and personnel was clear. And I think the amount was very fair and reasonable given the extent of Charles Williams' injuries.”
However, in its pretrial memorandum, Aria claimed that its physicians and hospital staff acted within the standard of care in treating Williams, claiming that they could not be blamed for thinking Williams was high on PCP.
“The fact that the toxicology screen was negative does not mean there were no intoxicants affecting the plaintiff,” defense papers said, adding, “The plaintiff's wounds did not appear to be self-inflicted to the clinicians, and the plaintiff denied suicidal ideation on the suicide risk assessment done in the ER, and at the time he was admitted to the floor at the Torresdale campus.”
Aria claimed there was nothing hospital staff could have done to prevent Williams from jumping out of a window.
“The plaintiff denied a history of psychiatric difficulties, and reported he had been stabbed by someone else,” defense papers said. “There was no clear evidence of the patient having a psychiatric disorder that would lead to self-destructive behavior. Even after the patient's fall, two Aria Health psychiatrists found no evidence of acute suicide risk, depression, anxiety or psychotic symptoms.”
Aria's lawyer, Peter J. Hoffman of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, declined to comment.
— P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly •
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute readDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
- 22 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 3Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
- 4Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
- 5DeSantis Appointed Assistant US Attorney to Broward Circuit Court Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250