Despite 'Slump,' Some Regional Law Firms Are Growing—Here's Why
Is the legal industry languishing or booming? It depends on where you look, and whom you ask.
March 23, 2018 at 01:35 PM
3 minute read
![Timothy Lynch, Offit Kurman](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2018/03/Timothy-Lynch-Vert-201803051746.jpg)
Is the legal industry languishing or booming? It depends on where you look, and whom you ask.
According to the 2017 Report on the State of the Legal Market, released at the beginning of the year by Georgetown Law's Center for the Study of the Legal Profession and the Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute, many U.S. law firms have spent the last decade treading water in terms of profitability. The consensus among firms seems to be that we're in a market slump, with revenue at a plateau, and client demand and attorney productivity in decline.
Two more reports published in November 2017 by Wells Fargo and Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group confirm this pattern—save for one exception: Pennsylvania. In an article for The Legal Intelligencer, Lizzy McLellan writes that “Pennsylvania firms appear to be in better shape than most,” and moreover, that “revenue growth at firms headquartered in Pennsylvania has not been driven by rate increases, but by demand.”
At Offit Kurman, we've experienced this phenomenon firsthand. Over the past year, our firm's offices throughout Pennsylvania have undergone significant growth. We are currently affiliated with 40 attorneys in the state, including seven at our office in the Philadelphia suburbs, which opened its doors just months ago.
While market conditions have certainly facilitated Offit Kurman's growth in Pennsylvania, location and timing are just a couple factors in our larger strategic initiatives. Indeed, our firm has continued on a path of sustained expansion in every state in which we do business. That's because, unlike other law firms, we have developed a culture and compensation model that encourages collaboration and rewards practitioners based on their unique strengths. We think of ourselves not only as the perfect legal partner® for our clients, but for our attorneys.
In “Legal Field Growth Is Rooted in Lateral Recruitment,” also published in the Legal Intelligencer, I wrote about our firm's lateral recruitment approach, explaining that most firms that are growing are doing so by lateral acquisition of legal talent. Lateral recruiting is and will continue to be a “seller's market” for the next decade, and firms should recognize that any lateral partner will ask questions about their potential new firm's long-term financial soundness as well as management's plan to help integrate them into the firm culture.
It's not just a financial matter. To sell potential recruits on a firm, the organization needs to adopt of a lawyer-centric mentality that emphasizes training and development opportunities. I believe the law firms that are most likely to “win” in this marketplace will need to implement development programs for lateral teams to help with client acquisition.
Timothy Lynch is the managing partner of Offit Kurman. He also sits on the firm's executive committee. As such, he is responsible for all of the lawyer operations at the firm and he is heavily involved in the daily operations and strategic planning for the firm. Before moving into these roles, he chaired the commercial litigation practice group at the firm. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/cc/43/b38dd9c34388b0bf5f2a720c8c65/brian-tannenbaum-767x633.jpg)
Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
5 minute read![Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b4/66/c519a4a64a75b05f9767d0168673/young-lombardo-767x633.jpg)
Embracing a ‘Stronger Together’ Mentality: Collaboration Best Practices for Attorneys
6 minute read![Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate Building an Ownership Mindset as a Gen Z Junior Associate](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/97/1c/820ec59f4ab4802f29bb9cdf386a/contemplation-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250