Despite 'Slump,' Some Regional Law Firms Are Growing—Here's Why
Is the legal industry languishing or booming? It depends on where you look, and whom you ask.
March 23, 2018 at 01:35 PM
3 minute read
Is the legal industry languishing or booming? It depends on where you look, and whom you ask.
According to the 2017 Report on the State of the Legal Market, released at the beginning of the year by Georgetown Law's Center for the Study of the Legal Profession and the Thomson Reuters Legal Executive Institute, many U.S. law firms have spent the last decade treading water in terms of profitability. The consensus among firms seems to be that we're in a market slump, with revenue at a plateau, and client demand and attorney productivity in decline.
Two more reports published in November 2017 by Wells Fargo and Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group confirm this pattern—save for one exception: Pennsylvania. In an article for The Legal Intelligencer, Lizzy McLellan writes that “Pennsylvania firms appear to be in better shape than most,” and moreover, that “revenue growth at firms headquartered in Pennsylvania has not been driven by rate increases, but by demand.”
At Offit Kurman, we've experienced this phenomenon firsthand. Over the past year, our firm's offices throughout Pennsylvania have undergone significant growth. We are currently affiliated with 40 attorneys in the state, including seven at our office in the Philadelphia suburbs, which opened its doors just months ago.
While market conditions have certainly facilitated Offit Kurman's growth in Pennsylvania, location and timing are just a couple factors in our larger strategic initiatives. Indeed, our firm has continued on a path of sustained expansion in every state in which we do business. That's because, unlike other law firms, we have developed a culture and compensation model that encourages collaboration and rewards practitioners based on their unique strengths. We think of ourselves not only as the perfect legal partner® for our clients, but for our attorneys.
In “Legal Field Growth Is Rooted in Lateral Recruitment,” also published in the Legal Intelligencer, I wrote about our firm's lateral recruitment approach, explaining that most firms that are growing are doing so by lateral acquisition of legal talent. Lateral recruiting is and will continue to be a “seller's market” for the next decade, and firms should recognize that any lateral partner will ask questions about their potential new firm's long-term financial soundness as well as management's plan to help integrate them into the firm culture.
It's not just a financial matter. To sell potential recruits on a firm, the organization needs to adopt of a lawyer-centric mentality that emphasizes training and development opportunities. I believe the law firms that are most likely to “win” in this marketplace will need to implement development programs for lateral teams to help with client acquisition.
Timothy Lynch is the managing partner of Offit Kurman. He also sits on the firm's executive committee. As such, he is responsible for all of the lawyer operations at the firm and he is heavily involved in the daily operations and strategic planning for the firm. Before moving into these roles, he chaired the commercial litigation practice group at the firm. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElder Litigators Confront Tough Questions in Last Act of Careers
Unlocking Your Lawyers' Rainmaking Potential: A Coaching Guide
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250